Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

A Brief Hillary Roundup
Posted by: Billy Hollis on Monday, February 26, 2007

A couple of weeks ago, I gave Hillary some points for not bobbling the “evil men” incident. It showed a side of her I hadn’t seen before.

This week, by contrast, I’m seeing exactly what I always expected from her. And it's not pretty.
First, there’s her “taboo” on discussing Bill’s adventures. The Washington Post tells us:
They [Hillary’s advisors] declared her husband's impeachment in 1998 — or, more accurately, the embarrassing personal behavior that led to it — taboo, putting her rivals on notice and all but daring other Democrats to mention the ordeal again.
It’s a clever strategy. It’s an attempt to conflate just about anything objectionable about Bill into an area that’s off limits.

Problem is, as the Post article points out, Hillary has introduced the subject of Bill into her campaign. His actions and punishments become relevant whether she likes it or not. Bill got fined and lost his law license for lying to a court, and that’s a simple fact. Hillary doesn’t get to point to Bill as one of the reasons for people to support her for the presidency, and then get to avoid the bad bits.

There are a lot of unsavory things about the Clinton administration that are complex matters of interpretations and opinion - Whitewater, Vince Foster, dodgy pardons, and the propriety of diddling interns, to give a few examples. It’s probably true that most voters don’t really want to slog through that territory again. Any opponent of Hillary shouldn’t depend on beating her on nothing more than Bill’s sleaze. Even though there’s a lot of it, it’s stale.

But it doesn’t take much reminding for people to remember that Bill’s presidency had its dark side. Just a side comment here and there will do it. And Hillary might as well get ready, because those comments are going to come.

The Post article was prompted by a contratemps resulting from David Geffen's comments last week. Geffen is supporting Obama, and the Post noted that he believes Hillary would be the easiest Democratic candidate for the Republicans to beat. But they didn't point out that he also said:
"Everybody in politics lies, but they [the Clintons] do it with such ease, it’s troubling.”
That's the real issue Hillary has to deal with. She's in a tough spot with it, because even members of her own party have made similar comments before. She can't blame that perception on the vast right-wing conspiracy. Peggy Noonan pointed that out, and brought back up the famous Bob Kerrey quote:
"Clinton's an unusually good liar. Unusually good. Do you realize that?"
The subtitle to Noonan's article is "Mrs. Clinton seems less inevitable after this week." Well, I never thought she was inevitable, mostly because those who imagined she could get through the entire campaign without confronting any elements of her past or Bill's were wrong.


On the subject of the Iraq conflict, Hillary has now completely staked out her position. And, in what I think is one of the biggests mistake of her candidacy so far, she did it in a video.

I don’t think her political consultants have yet realized that we’re in the YouTube era. Or, more generally, the “Web 2.0” era, in which mashing content is a major part of the action. Michelle Malkin at HotAir already took a whack at it, but her version is intended as red meat for Hillary foes. If conditions in Iraq start looking like we might actually succeed, then Hillary is stuck. That video will be hung around her neck by anyone who wants to make her judgment look bad. Some clever editing could have the entire nation laughing at her.

In essence, she has bet her entire candidacy on us failing in Iraq. While it might appease the anti-war left, I don’t think mainstream voters will respond to that kind of pessimism.

The video also reminded me of Hillary’s biggest problem connecting with voters – she has all the warmth of cold pancakes without syrup. When she says she wants to “keep the conversation going”, it’s completely devoid of sincerity.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Bill’s presidency had its dark side... And Hillary might as well get ready, because those comments are going to come.
Absolutely, exactly right. The only way for her to stop it is to bow out.

I admit to having thought at the get-go that the nomination was hers to lose. And now with the campaign just past its premature beginning, it seems that she may already be losing it. Yay!

This cartoon is over a month old, but I saw it for the first time just last night. And laughed out loud. I hope the whole sordid pile does her in.
Written By: Linda Morgan
URL: http://
I hadn’t seen that cartoon. It really does capture Hillary’s problem. I especially liked Bill sitting on top, flipping through centerfolds.
Written By: Billy Hollis
URL: http://
Wasn’t the 2000 election the "Search for the Un-Clinton" ?
Even Al Gore didn’t want to bring up Clinton any more than necessary.

Is 7 years enough to forget why we were weary of the Clintons in 2000 (and 1999 .. and 1998 ..) ?

Can we at least get a promise that Craig Livingstone won’t be hired back into the White House ? And ban the likes of John Huang and Mochtar Riady from the premises (and their money from the campaigns).

And I had forgotten about that Bob Kerrey quote.
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Now we have this Not Listed.
Written By: Neo
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks