Speaking of Marines, I can’t get this picture out of my head.
America is not at war. The Marine Corps is at war; America is at the mall. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
|
Neo: I can’t get over the jerk at the "Moderate" Voice taking credit for it. |
| |
Written By:
Joe Tobacco
URL:
http://www.cadillactight.com
|
|
"Former Marine" is the correct terminology according to my "former Marine" son-in-law. It’s when they call them ex-Marines, like the headline for the story, that really ticks him off. There is only one way to become an ex-Marine and that is to be kicked out of the Corps. |
| |
Written By:
Jay Evans
URL:
http://
|
Ugh - I just linked a few times to some of the sites and ended up at http://themoderatevoice.com - I’m reading the discussion there about support for the troops and such and someone makes a comment - There is a LOT that can be done (and needs to be done) in the way of direct citizen support for our troops. One example I came across recently is a nonprofit that finds foster homes for pets of servicemen and women who are deployed (www.netpets.org). To which the moderator (someone calling themself Gray) has this gem - (emphasis mine)Hmm, I’m not so sure, CS. As you said, there are many who already support the troops by real action. But there’s a large group who sees those stickers and cords as a way to show their patriotism, without living up to the goal. Imho, the simple question: ‘What have you really done for the troops recently?’ will shame many of those into finally doing something.
And one other point: Charity organisations are a great tool for providing services that the government can’t or won’t offer. But, let’s face it, it’s humiliating for the troops to have to be the object of others’ generosity, as if they haven’t earned the right to receive this care as part of teir service. Most soldiers are proud people, they do a dangerous and demanding job, and they shouldn’t have to beg for help from strangers. The government has an obligation to provide the care for military personel, it simply can’t get rid of that resposnsibility because private organisations are willing to step in. Soldiers deserve fair treatment, they shouldn’t be degraded to beggars! Simply supporting charity organisations, without actively demanding Congress to make provisions for a fair treatment of the troops, is doing only half the job. That entire statement irks me. First, saying anyone who takes or needs assistance from a charity is a ’beggar’, but someone who takes or needs assistance from the government is not??? I believe there are people in both camps who just need help at that point in time. Why does Gray make one a beggar and one something else? And since when did supporting something through charity relive the government of any responsibility of anything?
I’m a little steamed and may not be making my point, and I would had posted at ’the moderate voice’ but they require a registration (how moderate is that???). So I came back home and b!tched. My apologies in advance. |
| |
Written By:
meagain
URL:
http://
|
|
Actually, in this case ’former Marine doesn’t apply, either - this gentleman is a - retired - Marine; he is still allowed to use his rank and to wear the uniform on appropriate occasions, unlike us actual fromer marines who did a few years and then left the Corps, often to serve in other Services. And Gunny Clady (I have no idea of his actual rank, but Gunnery Sergeant is a good guess) - good for you! |
| |
Written By:
Trenton
URL:
http://
|