|
What do you expect from the French. They are only good at losing wars and insulting visitors. Fortunately our Founding fathers had the foresight to adopt freedom of the press in the first amendment to the Constitution. |
| |
Written By:
James E. Fish
URL:
http://
|
During parliamentary debate of the law, government representatives said the offense of filming or distributing films of acts of violence targets the practice of “happy slapping,” in which a violent attack is filmed by an accomplice, typically with a camera phone, for the amusement of the attacker’s friends. Instaed of banning the filming, they’d make much more progress by offering a reward for films of "unhappy ass-whipping," in which the violent beatings of perpetrators of "happy slapping" are filmed immediately after their offense. Bonus bucks awarded if the happy slapper’s camera phone has to be extracted from one of his own orifices to recovers the file. |
| |
Written By:
Terry
URL:
http://
|
|
Is this what we should embrace in a "multi-lateral" view of the world ? |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
|
Where’s Dr Erb telling us what a great thing this is, I mean, afer all, this country(France) is part of the standard used when making judgements about the United States. |
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
In somewhat related news,Access to the popular video-sharing website YouTube has been suspended in Turkey following a court order.
The ban was imposed after prosecutors told the court that clips insulting former Turkish leader Mustafa Kemal Ataturk had appeared on the site.
According to Turkish media, there has been a "virtual war" between Greek and Turkish users of the site, with both sides posting insulting videos. For all the complaining I may do about our politicians and whatever else, I’m pretty darn glad I live in this country.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6427355.stm |
| |
Written By:
Faisca
URL:
http://faisca.wordpress.com
|
My favorite part of the article is in the very first sentence.
Who’s behind this heavy handed squelching of free speech? The French Constitutional Council
Now that’s funny. In an "I’m pretty happy I don’t live there" sort of way. |
| |
Written By:
Veeshir
URL:
http://
|
It seems rather crass to condemn, "the French," whole cloth for this. There has been, as noted, resistance and outcry from civil liberties groups and that it was referred to the constitutional council suggests that some members of the parliament (I think that the constitutional stipulates that either sixty assemblymen or sixty senators are needed for a referral, the article is unclear on that) were hoping that it would be ruled unconstitutional. Of course, it may have been Sarkozy’s supporters making sure that they wouldn’t be rudely surprised by a constitutional challenge later.
It’s a ridiculous law and stupidly impinges upon liberties to attack a practice that could be been acted against in better ways. I wouldn’t be surprised if the bill’s intentions are really more sinister than professed.
It is depressing for the French people as well given that Nikolas Sarkozy will be a major presidential candidate and that the other real alternative is Marie-Ségolène Royal, whom I will admit some admiration for on the grounds of her support for devolution, but cannot generally think well of for her rather arch socialism. It’s not really my concern, of course, our own dismal contest in the United States offers enough to grumble over.
One would only hope that the bill is either amended or fails at some point on the path to enactment, but I wouldn’t place a bet on either, but then again, I don’t gamble. |
| |
Written By:
Paludicola
URL:
http://www.vikinghats.com
|