Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
For most, further involvement in Iraq boils down to this
Posted by: McQ on Monday, March 12, 2007

And, surprisingly, the LA Times says it very well:
This is not to say that Congress has no constitutional leverage — only that it should exercise it responsibly. In a sense, both Bush and the more ardent opponents of the war are right. If a majority in Congress truly believes that the war is not in the national interest, then lawmakers should have the courage of their convictions and vote to stop funding U.S. involvement. They could cut the final checks in six months or so to give Bush time to manage the withdrawal. Or lawmakers could, as some Senate Democrats are proposing, revoke the authority that Congress gave Bush in 2002 to use force against Iraq.

But if Congress accepts Bush's argument that there is still hope, however faint, that the U.S. military can be effective in quelling the sectarian violence, that U.S. economic aid can yet bring about an improvement in Iraqi lives that won't be bombed away and that American diplomatic power can be harnessed to pressure Shiites and Sunnis to make peace — if Congress accepts this, then lawmakers have a duty to let the president try this "surge and leverage" strategy.

By interfering with the discretion of the commander in chief and military leaders in order to fulfill domestic political needs, Congress undermines whatever prospects remain of a successful outcome. It's absurd for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) to try to micromanage the conflict, and the evolution of Iraqi society, with arbitrary timetables and benchmarks.
The two emphasized lines tell the tale of these attempts by Congress to do other than what it is constitutionally authorized to do. Again, if Congressional Democrats truly believe that this war must end, have the courage to defund it. If they're not going to do that, then step back, shut up and let those who have the authority to actually make decisions about the conduct of the war do so.

Either way there are going to be political repercussions and the Democrats aren't going to be able to avoid them, no matter how hard they try.
Congress should not hinder Bush's ability to seek the best possible endgame to this very bad war. The president needs the leeway to threaten, or negotiate with, Sunnis and Shiites and Kurds, Syrians and Iranians and Turks. Congress can find many ways to express its view that U.S. involvement, certainly at this level, must not go on indefinitely, but it must not limit the president's ability to maneuver at this critical juncture.
Common sense is an uncommon commodity these days, but for once, the LA Times displays a bit. Now let's see if the Democrats can manage a little themselves and back off efforts to micromanage the war.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
As I read this, I had to keep looking at the front page of the paper - Was this really the LA Times?
 
Written By: SShiell
URL: http://
The beltway dems and their, ardent supporters within the press realize that they are losing political points with the center (left) majority while being portrayed as weak for pandering to the very vocal hard left. Be ready for more of these scripted articles so the democratics can get out of a pickle and save face by showing responsible restraint. The press will start to shut the tap on articles about the anti-war crowd if they perceive it is starting to hurt the democratics in the polls.
 
Written By: coaster
URL: http://
The plan is an unruly mess: bad public policy, bad precedent and bad politics. If the legislation passes, Bush says he’ll veto it, as well he should.
Surprise. The L.A. Times got something right for a change.

The Democrats know this plan will fly like a brick. It’s a sop to the far left, end the war now crowd, as well as another attempt to embarrass Bush. Scoring political points rather than doing what is right is what is wrong with both parties.
 
Written By: James E. Fish
URL: http://
Comon man! Nonbinding resolutions and unconstitutional proposals are all the Dems have left! Don’t take that away from them
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
Comon man! Nonbinding resolutions and unconstitutional proposals are all the Dems have left! Don’t take that away from them
I’d let them have their Bovine Scatology if it didn’t give aid and comfort to the enemy. This political posturing only gives them hope, if they wait long enough they will win by default, de fault of a democratic hit job.
 
Written By: James E. Fish
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider