Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Blog Talk Radio ... 11PM EST
Posted by: McQ on Friday, March 30, 2007

Listen Live

Tonight. 11pm EST.

Topics:

Was John McCain seriously considering switching parties? And if so, does it matter now?

Should the Senate investigate Senator Dianne Feinstein and the contracts the committee - which she chaired and was ranking member - let to her husband's company? Many of them were non-bid.

Weigh in on the law Congress is considering about protecting the "John Does" in law suits where citizens report suspicious behavior (like the "flying Imam" case).

Tell us your opinion of the Iran hostage situation.

 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Another interesting blogcast, gentlemen. A duo of observations about the ’last 15 years’ of growing "pressure" of hateful partisanship, however:

Even thousands of years ago, observers such as Ovid, Cicero, and Ecclesiastes 7:10 noted the hollow wisdom in the perception that things are worse now in the present than they were in the past. Such a pessimistic view is common to human nature (especially in the middle-aged), but that does NOT make the view intellectually honest. The puerile and hostile partisanship we decry today is no better or worse than the long ago furious partisanship between Hamilton and Jefferson, or between Augustus and Anthony. The longing for the ’better’ Golden Age in the past is not an anabolic grounding for building a good life, as the popular contemporary longing for the return to the Golden Age of the 7C Caliphate should make us aware.

Secondly, partisanship is a noted feature of a free people. Moreover, partisanship is one measure of the HEALTH of a free polity, at least from the perspective of those of us more concerned with pluralism than those of us more concerned with monism, absolutism, and ’unity’ (revisit Aristotle’s criticism of Plato’s ’unity,’ as being "excessive"). What is fascinating about political partisanship is its easy plummet into hate.

The hate of political partisans, both by the Left and the Right, is grounded in human fear; essentially, the instinctual fears that the alternative or contrary opinion is going to prevail, to ’win,’ to survive, at the cost of the survival of the other opinion. Therefore, the ideologies which elicit such partisan loyalty are based upon our respective psychologies, which in turn are grounded in these two opposing primal instincts, both frightened to hell that the ’other’ will win.

It is essential to freedom that these two primal instincts have full play, and that they are honored for their observable existence, even as they are both decried for how "stoopid" the other is. For freedom to thrive, it is essential that these two opposing primal fears within us all be able to voice their views; the beneficial result is the actual releasing of the "pressure" of partisanship. Without the release of such normal partisan "pressure," a people are not free, a lesson taught to us by Hitler, Marx, and Khomeini.

The expression of partisan hatred (Dr. Dean, famously), is symptomatic of an intense inner fear. That’s not to excuse the hate, but merely to try to explain it. But, that so many of us willingly vote for those who hate is profoundly disturbing. Perhaps if we better understood that such expressions of political hate are based upon primitive, instinctual fears, we would make a better, more rational counter-argument...on blogcasts.

’Be free,’ gentlemen. Love your show.

 
Written By: a Duoist
URL: http://www.duoism.org

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider