When did diplomats become stupid enough to believe that your enemy is saying exactly what they mean?
This is the most mystifying aspect of modern diplomacy to me. I suppose it’s part of the fundamentally racist nature of modern leftist thinking; only white people are evil and duplicitous, when anyone else speaks it is with the pure honest voice of a child. Or something like that.
I mean, the breathtaking level of naivety on display in those quotes just amazes me. This isn’t even a left/right issue; you don’t have to have a particular ideology to see that this issue goes well beyond the first-order effects. This isn’t about an error, this is about aggression, and your response to it. Only an idiot, of any ideology, would believe that this is at all about "straying into Iranian waters".
Come on, be more fair. You’re dealing with humans, just like you. If you can be evil and rapacious and duplicitous and oppressive and imperialistic and misogynistic and ideologically blinded, so can they. |
| |
Written By:
Jeremy Bowers
URL:
http://www.jerf.org/iri
|
Harsh language. Heh... all I could think of was this exchange from Aliens - Gorman: Apone! Look... we can’t have any firing in there. I, uh... I want you to collect magazines from everybody.
Hudson: Is he f***in’ crazy?
Frost: What the hell are we supposed to use man? Harsh language? Whatever happened to ’speaking truth to power’? I guess only when the ’power’ is Bush. |
| |
Written By:
meagain
URL:
http://
|
Officials in London said that they believe their “confidence-building” operations, in which they offer to guarantee the Iranian government that British vessels will not stray into Iranian waters, offer the best hope of winning the freedom of the sailors and marines who have been in custody since they were seized by Iran’s Republican Guards on March 23. Perhaps if the Brits pay Iran a dimmini tax, that would help as well . . . |
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
Officials in London said that they believe their “confidence-building” operations, in which they offer to guarantee the Iranian government that British vessels will not stray into Iranian waters, offer the best hope of winning the freedom of the sailors and marines who have been in custody since they were seized by Iran’s Republican Guards on March 23 Erb would be proud.
In the meantime, can Iran give us a confidence-building guarantee that their soldiers won’t "stray" into Iraq?
There are consequences for being weak. Blair is going to find that out. |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
I had never heard of the Globe and Mail before so I had a look at their site. I noticed they were Canadian, so should your title not read: "BDS-Canadian Style" ? |
| |
Written By:
Kav
URL:
http://livingrealworld.blogspot.com
|
There are consequences for being weak. Blair is going to find that out.
If we continue down the path taken by the Democrats in Congress we will also find out the consequences of being or seeming weak. It seems the Democratic party is representing those clamoring for a “One World Government” and not the American Public. Every time they have a choice between “What’s best for America” and “What’s best for Liberal ideology” they choose the latter. |
| |
Written By:
James E. Fish
URL:
http://faroutfishfiles.blogspot.com/
|
I had never heard of the Globe and Mail before so I had a look at their site. Yep, they are a Toronto based paper. |
| |
Written By:
cap joe
URL:
http://
|
I had never heard of the Globe and Mail before so I had a look at their site. I noticed they were Canadian, so should your title not read: "BDS-Canadian Style" ? Yes it should (and now does), and sorry about that Kav.
You know what they say about "assumption". |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
UPDATE: An "oops" of my own, I mistakenly titled the piece "BDS British-style" and then cited a Canadian paper. Eh, you all look alike to me. Check Drudge...looks like you were prescient after all |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|