|
The larger story is the way that government "assistance" inevitably morphs into even greater restrictions on freedom as government is forced to choose between different constituencies as a result of the tradeoffs necessitated by its regulation. This is a minor example, but think of attempts to require motorcycle helmets or ban transfats (justified by government healthcare), efforts requiring schools to admit ROTC (justified by government education spending), etc. |
| |
Written By:
Sean
URL:
http://www.myelectionanalysis.com
|
|
Yep, when government gets involved it necessarily must start dictating the terms. It’s unavoidable. Freedom is incompatible with government spending and regulation. Witness the rampant PCness anywhere the government drops an ill-gotten dollar. |
| |
Written By:
Douglas Black
URL:
http://
|
Yep, when government gets involved it necessarily must start dictating the terms. It’s unavoidable. Freedom is incompatible with government spending and regulation. Yet in many democratic states people are far more free than in authoritarian or totalitarian states. So the level of ’dictating terms’ must be flexible. I think the Minneapolis decision is reasonable here, and not one that will lead to government dictation. Beware of extreme positions; reality is more complex and usually involves trade offs. |
| |
Written By:
Scott Erb
URL:
http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/~erb/blog.htm
|
To keep specific to the issue..........has anyone considered the potential danger of taking a ride with a Moslem who hates being forced to carry you..... Hope this works out ok, but damn what if................ |
| |
Written By:
darohu
URL:
http://
|