Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Cold Fusion
Posted by: Dale Franks on Sunday, May 06, 2007

The Navy's Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center here in San Diego has just published a paper that indicates they may have found a method of creating a cold fusion reaction.
Appearing in the respected journal Naturwissenschaften, which counts Albert Einstein among its distinguished authors, the article claims that Spawar scientists Stanislaw Szpak and Pamela Mosier-Boss have achieved a low energy nuclear reaction (LERN) that can be replicated and verified by the scientific community...

Szpak and Boss now claim to have succeeded at last by coating a thin wire with palladium and deuterium, then subjected it to magnetic and electric fields. The researchers have offered plastic films called CR-39 detectors as evidence that charged particles have emerging from their reaction experiments.

The Spawar method shows promise, particularly in terms of being easily reproduced and verified by other institutions.
Fascinating.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Excellent... If this can happen (I mean really happen, in a reliable, semi-portable size), oil will become a worthless filler.

THINK about it. Absolutely amazing...
 
Written By: Scott
URL: http://
oil will become a worthless filler.
Not quite. Still useful for plastics and other things.
 
Written By: Mark A. Flacy
URL: http://
Interesting, but wake up me when:

A) Those other institutions HAVE verified and reproduced their results and

B) The technique is found to work on a -usable- scale. There are plenty of nifty reactions (physical, chemical, etc) that don’t scale well.
 
Written By: Lysenko
URL: http://
meh. i remember back in houstion when the UH prof announced he’d found a way to allow superconductivity at temps above absolute zero. much hoopla; wild speculative scenarios about how we’d have energy coming out our ears; serious nods of agreement that this would soon change everything. ("electric cars! electric streets! ray guns!") this was.....geez....back in the late ’80’s, maybe? early 90’s?

and now i’m buying a gallon of gas for $3.50, and my electric bills this summer will top $400 a month. in other parts of the country, there’ll be rolling brownouts. here: in america. not uzbekistan or zimbabwe.

so i’m a tad skeptical on this one.
 
Written By: bloodrage bob
URL: http://
Maybe, maybe not. The trick is sustaining the reaction and getting more energy out than you put in. Being able to turning lead into gold would be cool, but not at $1,000 a gram.
 
Written By: Jay Evans
URL: http://
It will be most interesting to see if the SPAWAR work can be replicated. If so, you can be sure you’ll hear about it from us first.

Bennett Daviss’ article in New Scientist on May 3 is a follow-up piece to the in-depth article on the SPAWAR San Diego research by Steven Krivit and Daviss published in New Energy Times in November.

Apparently, New Scientist chose to neglect the term "low energy nuclear reactions," which those of us observing, and working in the field have now adopted.

The term "cold fusion" was never chosen by Fleischmann and Pons; it was wished on them by the press. It was and is a poor descriptor for the phenomenon. The concept of fusion remains highly speculative, a variety of phenomena are clearly not fusion, and then there is the Widom-Larsen not-fusion theory. (http://www.newenergytimes.com/wltheory)

Related New Energy Times stories:
Report on the 2006 Naval Science and Technology Partnership Conference (Sept. 10, 2006) (http://newenergytimes.com/news/2006/NET18.htm#FROM...
Extraordinary Evidence (Nov. 10, 2006) (http://newenergytimes.com/news/2006/NET19.htm#ee)
Extraordinary Courage: Report on Some LENR Presentations at the 2007 American Physical Society Meeting (March 16, 2007) (http://newenergytimes.com/news/2007/NET21.htm#apsr...
Charged Particles for Dummies: A Conversation With Lawrence P.G. Forsley (May 10, 2007) (http://newenergytimes.com/news/2007/NET22.htm)


Steven Krivit
Editor, New Energy Times


 
Written By: Steven B. Krivit
URL: http://newenergytimes.com

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider