|
I’m sure they had no idea the units would deploy over a period of weeks or months. They assume we can teleport guys in and have a result in say, a long weekend? |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
Why in the world should anyone pay any attention to an editorial board who won’t even let all the surge units deploy before losing their faith in what they backed previously and call for the withdrawal of all troops Don’t be so harsh. They’re only following the playbook. As has been noted many times before by many here, the actual success or failure of the surge is irrelevant- we’re going to be told it’s a failure by the Dems and have that conclusion rammed down our throats by their press stooges. Given that light, the LA Times actions make plenty of sense. What better way to give their changing positions a patina of credibility and reasonableness?
|
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
Sorry to one-up you guys. The LN says that we need to give the surge a chance. There is always the 10% (in this case the LAT) that doesn’t get the word (probably because they have been independent lately) who need to be shot down. Trust me; the LAT will fall in line. |
| |
Written By:
notherbob2/robert fulton
URL:
http://
|
|
We should take advice on military strategy from a paper that can’t even stop its bleeding circulation? |
| |
Written By:
MarkD
URL:
http://
|