Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Kansas Guard comment politically motivated?
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, May 10, 2007

From the rumor mill:
There are rumblings that Kansas Governor Sebelius’ remarks about how recovery efforts post the massive tornado that destroyed Greensburg were coerced by Howard Dean and the upper levels of the Democratic Party and were in direct contradiction to the facts.

Several readers this morning have already commented to me that Jim Quinn, political talk show host based here in Pittsburgh from 104.7 WPGB, has cited a source with authority on the subject that Howard Dean personally called the Governor to set the wheels in motion for her to claim that efforts were being hampered by lack of equipment due to the war in Iraq.

The story is plausible because both Senator Sam Brownback and the White House have issued conflicting stories where, after contacting officials in the state, they were told there were plenty of resources for the recovery effort.

The source claims that Sebeliuss called Senator Brownback to express her regret over the remarks and reassure him that they were not her own feelings but that rather those of the Democratic leadership.

This is developing and so far has not been confirmed. Stay tuned. I have contacted both the Senator and the Governor for comment but have not received any.
Interesting. Again, at this time it is a rumor, but certainly a plausible rumor.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
If the rumor is true, that means the governor deliberately to please the Democratic party leadership.

Doesn’t speak very well for her, does it?
 
Written By: steverino
URL: http://steverino.journalspace.com/
No, it doesn’t.

As I said, I hope she’s enjoyed her time in the Governor’s seat. Her opponent need only hammer this one issue next election (isn’t she up in ’08?) and she’s done.

Kansasans (i believe) dislike a) having their military denegrated b) being treated like morons and c) having their state and the deaths of fellow residents used for political hay.

that kinda crap might fly in Louisiana where the Liberals do roam, but I’m pretty sure it doesn’t in the State of my Birth...
 
Written By: Scott
URL: http://
As I stated at the time:
The only question is if the gov. got that talking point direct from Pelosi or Dean.
If this is true, they’re both scum.
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
It doesn’t fly all that well in Lousiana either. Gov. Blanco has already announced she’s not running for re-election this year. Probably because she took a look at Bobby Jindal’s numbers.
 
Written By: SaveFarris
URL: http://
On the bright side, at least now we know what’s the matter with Kansas.

That and the fact that it is, at present, Earp-less.
 
Written By: MichaelW
URL: http://asecondhandconjecture.com
That and the fact that it is, at present, Earp-less.
LOL!

I knew you were just waiting for the right opportunity ... ;)
 
Written By: McQ
URL: http://www.qando.net/blog
Earp-less? I was under the impression it’s been that way for, umm, a while now...
 
Written By: Scott
URL: http://
oh, I can already here the denial spin they’ll put on this.

Someone, probably lower ranked then Dean or Pelosi, will say, oh we just mentioned it in passing, and only meant it as a question we should investigate.

Or, what we meant to say was...
 
Written By: Keith_Indy
URL: http://asecondhandconjecture.com/
Or, what we meant to say was...
"We were for the insinuation before we were against it..."
 
Written By: Scott
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider