Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

The interminable campaign for President
Posted by: McQ on Wednesday, June 06, 2007

We political junkies have been mostly enjoying the fray, but as suspected, most "normal" Americans really haven't been paying much attention:
The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted May 30-June 3 among 1,503 adults, finds that overall voter engagement in the presidential campaign remains somewhat limited, despite intense press coverage of the race. Just 33% of all voters say they have given a lot of thought to the presidential candidates, up only modestly from December (27%). However, Republican voters have caught up with the Democrats in campaign engagement, after trailing in previous surveys.
It is also why, as Ed Morrisey points out, the same questions are asked over and over of the same candidates during different debates.
Last night, I complained about the repetitive nature of the questioning at the debates. For the third straight debate, Rudy Giuliani had to state his position on abortion, and Mitt Romney had to answer for his change of position over the last two-plus years. As it turns out, though, CNN may have had a good reason to ask the same plodding questions over and over again, as Pew Research discovered that less than half of the voters have paid attention.
Indeed. And their antipathy reflects mine at this point in the process. Other than restating their positions and a good sound bite or two, not much is going to come out of these debates which is new or useful. And, as is obvious, its not even clear that all the candidates who are going to run are in the field yet.

Let's face it, these debates are for the activists. They are, for the most part, the only ones paying attention. And as we've pointed out many times, they are the ones who are going to vote in the primaries and have a large hand in picking their party's candidate.

That brings us to why candidates are so interested in engaging the "new media", especially now. It's why you see some of them putting guest posts on blogs, having conference calls will bloggers and frankly, pandering to them. It is because it is among the readers and writers of blogs that a preponderance of those who are paying attention are to be found and, one would guess, be inclined to participate in the primary process. Or said more simply, that's where the votes are.

But if you think these endless early debates in which positions are stated and restated are going to plow new ground or settle anything, well you're entitled to your opinion. I just don't see that happening until we get past some of the first primaries and the field thins. I also don't see that happening until all the candidates who might be candidates are in the race. Until then these debates keep the candidates visible to those who are paying attention and not much else. And for those who enjoy that ... well enjoy. Me? I'm watching baseball.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Don’t these guys and gals ever shut up ?

The endless drone of these political hacks is torture. Doesn’t the Constitution prohibit "cruel and inhuman" activities such as this relentless campaign to dull the minds of America ?

Isn’t it time to limit campaigns and fundraising to the 6 months prior to an election ?
Written By: Neo
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks