Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Hell on earth
Posted by: McQ on Tuesday, July 03, 2007

I can't imagine how else to describe the deteriorating conditions in Zimbabwe as inflation runs rampant and a clueless dictator takes out his failure on those trying to live through it:
Plain-clothes police sought to enforce Zimbabwe's new price controls by raiding shops yesterday as President Robert Mugabe's regime waged a desperate struggle against soaring inflation.

They roughed up shop owners and staff and arrested 20 businessmen. Shoppers swarmed over supermarket shelves in the capital, Harare, intent on grabbing "bargains".

Ministers claim that the inflation rate of 4,500 per cent - the highest in the world - is solely caused by greedy shopkeepers raising their prices for no good reason. Propaganda tries to portray businessmen as the true authors of the economic collapse - deflecting blame from Mr Mugabe.

But economists say that the prime cause of inflation is the government's huge budget deficit, which it deals with by printing more money. This immense borrowing requirement is, in turn, the result of the wider economic failure caused mainly by the seizure of white-owned farms.
The "bargains", of course, were goods which had prices set by the government. Naturally after selling them at those prices, which completely ignore the real worth of Zimbabwe's horribly inflated currency, shop owners can't afford to buy replacement goods. So those that try to align their prices with their real costs are those who are being arrested and roughed up.

The result?
Shelves in supermarkets across Harare are swiftly emptying and police in full riot gear linger outside.

The new controls force supermarkets to sell food at below its cost from wholesalers. Unless the regime relents, there will be food shortages, empty shelves and, eventually, the closure of all shops.

"We won't be restocking. If need be, we might have to close shop rather than stick to government prices," said the manager of one store.
That's reality. A totally inept and corrupt government which has ruined one of the best economies in Africa has now made it so even basic staples won't be available soon. And, as they want you to believe, it's all the fault of greedy shopkeepers. Reminds me of a refrain I've heard elsewhere at times.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Will anyone run their business for loss? The Zimbabwe government,put it exactly Mugabe is the sole reason for the situation in the country..He is trying to escape from the blame by just pass it onto innocent shopkeepers...
mobile phone deals
 
Written By: sakthi
URL: http://www.phoneinn.co.uk/
"But economists say that the prime cause of inflation is the government’s huge budget deficit, which it deals with by printing more money. This immense borrowing requirement is..."

It seems somebody else is also clueless. Printing money doesn’t involve borrowing.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
Timmah,

Read the first phrase of the sentence. It’s poorly written, but I think the "immense borrowing requirement" refers back to the "government’s huge budget deficit."
 
Written By: Sean
URL: http://www.myelectionanalysis.com
I read the plea in the TimesOnLine Sunday a plea from a Bishop that the UK invade Zimbabwe in order to prevent the starvation of possibly millions. I emailed a Marxist colleague to ask what could be done. With a heavy heart I append a somewhat lengthy set of exchanges that I feel explains way too much.


"Plea from Zimbabwe:

So. What’s the answer, if there is one? I’m serious. I don’t
see any good way out of this. What should be done, and by whom (and is it likely to actually happen) to prevent "millions" from starving to
death?> Where, exactly, is the international outrage? Where is the UN? Where are the NGOs interested in the general welfare of the people of
the world?

D

I’ll bet Jesus would have used his turn signal.

“Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies
have>>>guns; why should we let them have ideas?"

— Joseph Stalin

"To be a nonconformist, you’ve got to wear the proper uniform."— Robert Heinlein (possibly apocryphal)

Subject: Re: Plea from Zimbabwe

Hmm, this link didn’t work, but I googled the topic and think I
found the article, or a similar one. Yes, Zimbabwe is a mess, and I
don’t think there is a simple answer. It’s a state on the verge of
collapse, with an appalling government, but what can be done to help the people?
The historical background for the mess includes the long accumulated effects of colonialism followed by neocolonialism, but that doesn’t point the way to a solution today. The whole international system of states really rests of a lot of problematical compromises, and this case is just one example of that larger problem. Maybe we can send them (our university) administration, they seem to be pretty good at creative accounting practices and sweeping crises under the rug!

R

I was out all day, getting ready to visit my family and kids. We leave
tomorrow.

Anyway, that’s a pretty depressing analysis. Actually, that’s a very
depressing analysis. Does this really mean there is *nothing* to be
done? Ever? Do all of the compromises just lead to more of the same?
What about a new system of states? If the current system can’t help
people like this, why do we compromise with the Zimbabwes of the world
in the UN at all?

Does a long history of colonialism or neocolonialism or any other kind
of ism mean we have to compromise with whatever group of thugs manages
to get on top and allow them to ’help’ make future compromises forever?

It just seems to me like almost anything would be better than standing
by while perhaps millions die, but maybe I don’t understand
international politics. Perhaps Stalin was truly right. "One death is
a tragedy, one million deaths is a statistic." (That’s probably not
perfect, but I remember the gist.) When does a million deaths become a
tragedy?

Personally, I think that, at the very least, states that are permitting
or forcing thousands to millions of deaths of their own people
(democide?) should have their voting rights in the UN suspended and
*all* their citizens who hold UN jobs sent home without pay until the
situation is corrected, but I’m kind of a harsh guy.

D
Well, I guess by those criteria the US should be the first to be expelled from the club, since we allow/cause so many to die - for example, we’re pretty far down the ranking on infant mortality despite having ample national resources... To say nothing of all the people our government actively kills in other places, but they’re never counted. And I guess by your call for someone (who would that be?) to "do something" about Zimbabwe’s lousy government you mean send in some military - which hasn’t proven to be notably effective in making people’s lives better, as we’re learning in Iraq... It is hard, but not impossible, to help people whose government is bent on preventing it, and occasionally the UN and NGOs and others manage to do something positive despite the obstacles. But in the long run we still need to address the question of why such governments are there, and even though you don’t want to hear about colonialism and neocolonialism and the Cold War, there are clearly powerful interests on a global scale that benefit from propping up rotten governments. That’s how we got the Bush administration! But you and I are never going to agree on any of this.

Have a safe trip and a nice visit with the family!
R

 
Written By: JorgXMcKie
URL: http://
Jumping Julius, that sounds awfully familiar. Ask a question, get some historical analysis of the effects of colonialism or the international blah blah.... which has little or no relevance to the original question but gives the writer an opening to flaunt his/her/its alledged expertise.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider