To finally defeat these groups, the Iranian connection is going to have to somehow be severed. I understand that guided bombs are great at cutting things.
Why we aren’t poking Israel saying "Look, we’ll publicly back, you, and privately give you stuff... No bomb the sh*t outta Iran" is beyond me.
Bomb them back into the stone age...
Which for them would be about two weeks ago last wednesday... |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
I’m not being flip when I say that, while capturing these guys surely will yield important intel, we need to see more "fierce gun battles" ensuing. Maybe in a week or so this guy could be "killed in an escape attempt".
The Quds are playing a dangerous game here—we need to exact a price for it. Simply capturing these guys while Tehran abducts another Western visitor in retribution is playing on their turf. |
| |
Written By:
spongeworthy
URL:
http://
|
Last I checked, Iraq was a sovereign nation that was having a number of high-level meetings with Iranian officials on a range of topics, including reconstruction, energy and security.
The dangerous game being played here is the US taking on Shiite militias. Sadr, Badr and Dawa forces represent the interests of millions of Iraqis. Maliki has already complained about US focusing attacks on Shia, and further attacks could really destabilize an already weak government.
And finally, it seems quite odd that the capture of one (1) Iranian would be the cause of such triumphalism on a blog sponsored by ex-military. The capture of one guy? C’mon. |
| |
Written By:
Francis
URL:
http://
|
The detained individual is suspected of coordinating with high-level IRGC-QF officers for the transportation of multiple Iraqis to Iran for terrorist training at IRGC-QF training camps. He is also a known logistics facilitator providing lethal aid to terrorists operating in central Baghdad. Yep, taking him out isn’t going to effect anything. Why bother reporting it at all???Last I checked, Iraq was a sovereign nation that was having a number of high-level meetings with Iranian officials on a range of topics, including reconstruction, energy and security. You forgot the part about Iran also supporting terrorists working against the Iraqi government.Sadr, Badr and Dawa forces represent the interests of millions of Iraqis. They represent THEIR OWN INTERESTS. If they were interested in the fate of Iraqis, they’d have joined the government and not been working against it.The capture of one guy? C’mon I suppose this is the official notice that, should we capture Osama bin Laden, we aren’t supposed to have any news releases about it. After all, it will just be one guy.
The depths of negativism amaze me. |
| |
Written By:
Keith_Indy
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
I think this problem will mostly solve itself in 2009, when the next Iraqi election are held. Iran is going to be very unpoplar by then, and the political cover for these Shia extremists will evaporate like summer dew.
Iraqis have a free press, Internet access and ten times as many phones as they did in 2003. They’re going to realize Iran is killing Iraqis. |
| |
Written By:
TallDave
URL:
http://www.deanesmay.com
|
The depths of negativism amaze me. This is Francis yer talking about... It isn’t negativism, not at all...
It’s utter stupidity. |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
And finally, it seems quite odd that the capture of one (1) Iranian would be the cause of such triumphalism on a blog sponsored by ex-military. Triumphalism?
Ye gods ...
It’s a report on a capture and its significance (i.e. how deeply Iran is invested in fomenting the violence perpetrated by the sectarian Shia militias there). |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
I was thinking the same thing, and had to lookup the word just to makes sure.
Francis - You Keep Using That Word; I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means |
| |
Written By:
Keith_Indy
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
One guy captured - um, Saddam Hussein. I didn’t want to get the demerits for being the first to bring up the leader of a certain European country in the 30’s and 40’s but there was another rather obvious ’one guy’ on my list first.
Geeze Francis, it’s so obvious that one guy, the right one guy, DOES make a difference. And in cases like this, the right one guy could lead to the capture or destruction of a large number of other scum bags. |
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
Francis, obviously you can’t comprehend "reward our friends and punish our enemies."
Translation: use the Shia to convince the Sunni they’ve lost and should work with us, then take the Sunnis and deal with Mookie and friends.
See also: "Defeat in detail." Have you ANY clue about tactics? (Rhetorical question) |
| |
Written By:
SDN
URL:
http://
|