Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
More on the YouTube political wars
Posted by: Billy Hollis on Monday, September 10, 2007

Several months ago, I talked about how changing technology affects political campaigns. Part of the ensuing discussion concerned the impact of video technologies on campaigns.

I was reminded of that discussion when I watched this video:



This one attacks Hillary Clinton. I think we're going to see variations against all the major candidates.

It's also pretty clear that humorous approaches will dominate campaign attack videos. A video is only effective if a lot of people watch it. Humor is the easiest way to draw people in and get the viral dissemination of the video needed to reach a large audience at low cost.

This video also demonstrates that creators will strike at the most vulnerable point for any particular candidate. For Hillary, that's the shennanigans of the Clinton White House. Those billing records that went missing for years never have been explained, and neither has the cattle futures money. A sympathetic media has long since dropped those subjects, but that doesn't mean they've been completely forgotten.

This campaign is going to be brutal. New weapons mean new tactics. There are no longer effective gatekeepers to maintain even informal standards about what to say and what not to say about candidates.

It doesn't bother me, really. I can't say that the hoorah over negative TV ads ever did either. If someone is being dishonest, that's different, and I don't support that. But much of what the mainstream commentariat calls "negative" is simply saying true things in a nasty way. And, given the nature of the web, dishonesty is more likely to exposed now than ever before.

Let the slime wars begin. You might was well enjoy them, because you can't stop them.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
But much of what the mainstream commentariat calls "negative" is simply saying true things in a nasty way.
I’d offer that what they call ’negative’ doesn’t have to be said in a ’nasty’ way. Sometimes just telling ’the truth’, no matter how you say it, is called negative.
 
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
If someone is being dishonest, that’s different, and I don’t support that.
The nice thing about the old days with big media was that they were always honest. They would never use forged memos in an attempt to sway a presidential election, for example.
 
Written By: Don
URL: http://
I wouldn’t be surprised if they start regulating this sort of speech somehow!
 
Written By: McLovin
URL: http://
Well when anti-war peace creeps want to slam Bush about the war they can say it is a quagmire or we didn’t find nuclear WMD stockpiles. When they become nasty is when they start to call him a liar for tricking us into a war and he’s a baby killer or whatever and say he’s the biggest threat to world peace. They always seem to end up doing that.
 
Written By: jows
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider