Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Update to Clinton fundraiser post
Posted by: McQ on Saturday, October 20, 2007

Yesterday I mentioned the possibility of dubious campaign contributions coming out of the Chinatown area of NYC (as raised by the LA Times). Today the NYT carried the following story:
Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign returned $7,000 in donations last spring that were linked to a fund-raising event in Chinatown in New York City, campaign officials said yesterday, acknowledging another instance where questionable donors came into Mrs. Clinton’s political orbit.

But unlike Mrs. Clinton’s trouble with the former fund-raiser Norman Hsu — whose extensive legal problems and dubious fund-raising practices came as a surprise — her campaign identified the concerns about the Chinatown fund-raising on its own, campaign officials said.

The Los Angeles Times reported yesterday that it had reviewed the cases of more than 150 donors apparently linked to the Chinatown event or to Chinese neighborhoods, and that dozens of donors could not be found, were not registered to vote or held jobs that probably did not pay well enough to finance such donations.
For instance:
...if a dishwasher gave $1,000 — the campaign sent letters asking them to affirm in writing that the money was their own.

In seven cases, with donations totaling $7,000, questions were raised, and those donors did not respond to requests to confirm their contributions. That money was then returned.
So of the $380,000, they returned $7,000. Obviously I have no information other than that provided by the NYT so I can only say that there at least seems to be some sort of minimal vetting process at work. And if you believe the Times, the process discovered the problems with some donations and returned the money. Of course, given the Clinton campaign's success in raising millions of dollars in campaign contributions, $7,000 is a real drop in the bucket as far as impact and helps the campaign avoid further scrutiny. Small price to pay.

For those of you wondering why I'd bother to put this up, it's because I feel some responsibility to follow up on a story I've recently posted when new information becomes available. I can't always do that, but I also can't bitch about the media when it doesn't do it if I don't at least try.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Speaking of following up on old stories, do we have any fresh information as regards the donations from Norman Hsu, of which reports had a significant amount still not returned as of two weeks ago?

Given that situation, is there any reason to expect that all of the donations from this latest Chinese eruption to be returned in a timely manner?

 
Written By: Bithead
URL: http://bitsblog.florack.us
The $7K returned sounds like a fig leaf to me.

It will allow her just enough wiggle room to get by on this issue.
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider