Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
SCHIP jr
Posted by: mcq on Thursday, October 25, 2007

Apparently the Dems are going to try again on the SCHIP program. The new bill, soon to be unveiled, will include:
First, there would be no funding for families making above 300 percent of the federal poverty line, which amounts to about $62,000 a year for a family of four. This is meant to address GOP criticism that too many middle income families might become eligible for government-subsidized health care.

Second, the new bill would cut off childless adults on SCHIP within one year of passage of the legislation, addressing concerns that too many adults are taking advantage of the program

And third, the legislation before the House Thursday would require more aggressive verification of Social Security numbers of SCHIP applicants, a move meant to assuage concerns that illegal immigrants could use bogus Social Security numbers to receive the health benefits. Under the Democratic proposal, applicants would have to provide more secondary documentation of citizenship if the Social Security Administration cannot confirm the applicant is a citizen.

Democrats have offered one other carrot for Republicans who opposed the first bill - they plan to require states to develop plans to prevent families with private insurance from dumping that coverage in favor of government coverage under SCHIP.
First, why 300%? Why not the present provisions?

Second, how do you like the fact that there's now acknowledgment that the present SCHIP program, a program for children, includes adults. Taking "single adults" out of the program isn't good enough. All adults should come out of the program, without exception.

Third, again acknowledgment of the fact that there is no requirement to check citizenship status before granting benefits. Does that surprise anyone?

Finally, federal program which requires states to come up with plans to keep those that can and are buying their own insurance from migrating to the federal program? Yeah, that'll work.

Unfortunately, this may be just enough to get the required number of Republicans to pass it with a veto proof majority.
Even though a majority of Republicans will likely oppose this bill, they'll have to work even harder to keep another dozen or so in their party from jumping ship. The Senate already has a veto-proof majority backing the SCHIP expansion, so there will be enormous pressure on politically vulnerable House Republicans to switch their position and support the latest bill.
These seem like mostly cosmetic changes and, in the end, it accomplishes the Democrat goal - expansion of the program.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
"These seem like mostly cosmetic changes and, in the end, it accomplishes the Democrat goal - expansion of the program."

I feel the real Democrat goal is to be able to continue to bludgeon Bush (and by extension, all Republicans) with the ’Bush hates kids’ mantra - all the way through the election. I would be surprised to see this version, or the next, or the next, pass into law. Each version will appear to be a compromise, but will be designed to have a ’poison pill’ which makes it impossible for enough Republicans to vote in favor.

There’s no point in passing SCHIP if you’re confident that HillaryCare! is only a year or so away. But to be able to cynically parade sick kids in front of the cameras while claiming that Bush and the Reps hate children - that’s election year gold.
 
Written By: Scot Sutton
URL: http://
"Second, how do you like the fact that there’s now acknowledgment that the present SCHIP program, a program for children, includes adults. Taking "single adults" out of the program isn’t good enough. All adults should come out of the program, without exception."

Proponents of the expansion argue that more eligible children are enrolled when parents are also included in the program. Apparently the incentive is that there is less hassle than that of having to deal with two different systems. Basically affirming the notion that people who are a net expense to society are also disposed to being derelict in their parental responsibilities. Heaven forbid that they be forced to fill out two sets of applications. The states are keen on the policy because the federal matching for SCHIP is more generous than that for Medicaid.
 
Written By: Dubya
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider