|
I’m shocked. Shocked. |
| |
Written By:
David Shaughnessy
URL:
http://
|
|
So if the ratio of conservative to liberal bloggers who are specifically sought out is 10:1, but a liberal blogger who asks after a ruckus has been raised can get invited, that’s "balance" to you? If job hiring or college admission programs were run on the same sort of basis, but with the ratios reversed, would you find that acceptable? |
| |
Written By:
Platypus
URL:
http://pl.atyp.us
|
I was wondering, actually, when this was going to come up... So here’s a challenge to Think Progress and all liberal blogs that are complaining about this - my email address is up on the upper left side of the blog. Email me and I’ll put you in touch with Jack Holt who administers this program. I think you’ll find he has absolutely no problem putting you on the list. From there it is up to you whether or not you make the calls. Like I said, in the 3 to 4 months I’ve been on, only one liberal blogger has been on and not he or anyone else from that site has ever bothered to come back. Since there’s invariably problems with the accuracy of articles at Think Progess, and accuracy issues as you point out, one wonders how their reflections of such gaggles as you’ve been attending will be any more accurate. And, how this will be called out, when they’re not. Of, better yet, what happens when they try doing a Helen Thomas. |
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
So if the ratio of conservative to liberal bloggers who are specifically sought out is 10:1, but a liberal blogger who asks after a ruckus has been raised can get invited, that’s "balance" to you? So you still don’t understand the point that for liberal bloggers to be "included" they have to choose to participate (or was that a bit too nuanced for you)?
Can’t make ’em call in you know.
|
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.qando.net/blog
|
I’ve been invited on these (and many other) conference calls, none of which I’ve responded to. I simply don’t have the time during the day to participate in conference calls for which I’m not paid, so I don’t respond to the emails alerting me to them. Despite my non-response, I continue to get invitations to such phone conference calls. I’m quite sure that the invitations are because I know Jon, but I also get emails from Hilary Clinton marketers, so make of that what you will.
My only point is that, as McQ intimates but doesn’t say, it’s not terribly difficult to get involved with these sorts of calls. If you express an interest, you will more than likely get an invitation.
Just sayin’. |
| |
Written By:
MichaelW
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
So if the ratio of conservative to liberal bloggers who are specifically sought out is 10:1, but a liberal blogger who asks after a ruckus has been raised can get invited, that’s "balance" to you? If job hiring or college admission programs were run on the same sort of basis, but with the ratios reversed, would you find that acceptable? So if they invite ten bloggers of a liberal bent, or twenty, how many do think will actually be on the call? My bet? Zero. It wouldn’t match your...oops, I mean their meme and narrative.
Horse. Water. Drink?
I’m not gonna be as diplomatic as McQ or MichaelW. You’re either an idiot or being deliberately obtuse. I’m guessing the former. |
| |
Written By:
Warrior Needs Food Badly
URL:
http://
|
" progressive bloggers or anti-war military bloggers are rarely featured."
I think this may indicate the real problem. They want to be ’featured’, they don’t want to just participate. Some kids just have to be the quarterback or they don’t want to play.
"So if the ratio of conservative to liberal bloggers who are specifically sought out is 10:1"
sounds to me like they were as specifically sought out as I was by Publisher’s Clearinghouse (sort of a pre-internet, postal spam for you young ’uns). |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|
|
Here’s a something else you can do McQ, next blog roundtable, ask Mr Holt about this very issue... |
| |
Written By:
Keith_Indy
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
pre-internet This concept confuses and infuriates me! |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
|
I was never asked to participate in this. Apparently they discriminate against blogs nobody knows about. :-) |
| |
Written By:
charles
URL:
http://www.twoconservatives.blogspot.com
|
|
I wasn’t asked either. Apparently they discriminate against blogs that don’t exist... |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
|
Actually it doesn’t bother me if DoD DELIBERAELY excludes Liberals. Why invite the Kossacs or Jane Hamsher or Oliver Willis in so they can deliberately misrepresent what you say or ask you why you enjoy killing innocent Iraqis so much or asking if the troops are tired of serving in Chimpy McShrub’s Never-Ending Haliburton War for Oil? You invite your friends over, not your enemies. |
| |
Written By:
Joe
URL:
http://
|
This concept confuses and infuriates me! Try turning your screen off, and try again. (Chuckle) |
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
...
No, I remain confused and infuriated.
And now I can’t see what I am typing... |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
"And now I can’t see what I am typing..."
Ah. Welcome to the world of ’touch typing’, another pre-internet artifact. And, in a further attempt to confuse and irritate you, I would like to add that the first computer terminal I used didn’t even HAVE a monitor. It was a modified IBM Selectric typewriter. You typed, then (eventually, if the data processing spirits were in the mood) the IBM Selectric typed back. Computer labs were a lot noisier then. Warmer, too. |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|
Well, there was the old model 33 teletypes we used to use with the PDP11’s...
|
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
"PDP11’s..."
Oh, yeah. With the paper tape? A $25,000, state of the art, 8 bit machine, if I recall correctly. For my class we had to load a small (10 lines or so) program by hand, flipping 8 toggle switches, one for each bit. |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|