Haha, "federalism", what a kidder. Reminds me of that joke Justice Thomas told in I believe the Raich dissent... something about the federal government having "limited and enumerated powers". Hilarious!
Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to check the list of approved hats. |
| |
Written By:
kevin r
URL:
http://
|
|
Who are you, and how did you manage to get online? |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
Well, I don’t think that you give enough credit to the states. When the federal government tied education money to students meeting standards set by the states themselves, many states lowered the standards.
Or at least I think I read that in a New York Times headline.
"Federalism" has been eclipsed by "get the f**k out of my way-ism," as the states and the national government fight to get into your pocket.
Here’s the civics test:
Question 1: Do you think that you pay too much in taxes?
Answer from most people: Yes
Question 2: Do you want to see universal health coverage?
Answer from most people: Yes
Is this a great country, or what? |
| |
Written By:
Martin McPhillips
URL:
http://mcphillips.blogspot.com/
|
"but we used to have this thing called the 10th Amendment that allowed exactly that sort of thing"
Sure, but you have to be able to count to 10, and that seems to be increasingly unlikely with our new multicultural education system. |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|
|
Well, unfortunately, the data from said experiments would be stridently manipulated by concerned forces via our poisoned political structures. We, the general public, would have no real clue as to which is better. As usual, we’d vote our preconceived tendency... which is how it is right now. So, it would turn into its own perpetual bureaucracy. The Department of Alternative Universes(?)... or some such sh$t... |
| |
Written By:
Rob
URL:
http://
|
|
I agree completely about the 10th amendment. Decentralization is good, in part because it allows experimentation, and in part because the more centralized something is, the more prone to bureaucratic stagnation and inefficiency. But I’m not sure what a "conservative" education would be vs. an "ideal world" education. I’m afraid that this tendency to see dichotomies or the world as "left vs. right" is part of the problem. It seems to me that a good education would serve people across the spectrum equally well, and that the goal is to simply provide quality education that gives students the tools to make good decisions and their own decisions. Bad education is indoctrination and rote learning. |
| |
Written By:
Scott Erb
URL:
http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/~erb/blog.htm
|
|
Where’s the fun if the federal government doesn’t get to "appropriate massive amounts of money" and tell other how to spend it? |
| |
Written By:
abw
URL:
http://abw.mee.nu
|
"In other words, why don’t they appropriate massive amounts of money for two grand experiments, one testing a conservative education solution, the other implementing an ideal-world progressive alternative." Why, after reading this sophomoric drivel, does anyone consider Klein worth reading? |
| |
Written By:
Grimshaw
URL:
http://
|
|
The "conservative" system would merely be vouchers and choice. Don’t need "massive funding" to do that. I have no idea what the progressive system would be...aren’t we already running that? |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|