Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Pick your battles carefully
Posted by: McQ on Sunday, November 04, 2007

Greg Sargent has a piece about Rudy G. going after Joe Biden on Wolf Blitzer's show:
It seems pretty clear cut. In the first interview, Rudy was asked explicitly about Joe Biden and foreign policy experience and he suggested very directly that Biden didn't have any, summarizing Biden's record thusly:
"It's one thing to speak about what you want or even pass laws about it. It's another thing to actually do it. Foreign policy experience to me means being an ambassador, being in the state department."
Unless I'm missing something, Rudy explicitly used the words "foreign policy experience." But then Rudy was later confronted about his contention that Biden Senate Foreign Relations Committee chair Biden lacks said experience. And he responded that he hadn't attacked Biden this way at all. "I didn't mention foreign policy." Rudy said. Of course, Rudy did in fact "mention foreign policy."

Wolf Blitzer did fact-check Rudy here, but he also kind of laughed off Rudy's mendacity — yet another reminder that many in the media elite still see Rudy as someone who hit the political jackpot on 9/11 but who is fundamentally unthreatening and is a kind of harmless buffoon.
Joe Biden is an "also ran" among presidential candidates. He hasn't a chance in Hades of gaining the nomination. But he is having a ball attacking Rudy. Rudy, for some reason, just can't seem to let things like that pass. Now don't get me wrong, there are certain attacks from anyone that you have to answer. But there are ways to answer them that don't end up putting a candidate in a hole of his own making.

Note what Rudy did here. He ended up looking a bit foolish (Biden heads the Senate Foreign Relations Committee) and he also managed to define foreign policy experience in a way that he can now be said to have none himself.

Sometimes it's better to ignore people like Biden who few are listening too anyway and to formulate an answer to questions like that which put a positive light on whatever experience you have (yes, that's called spin, but we are talking about presidential candidates here) vs. ending up shooting yourself in the foot as Giuliani has in this case.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
He’s talking about Dodd who has gone nuts with Peace Corps and the State Department.
 
Written By: FD
URL: http://
Guiliani is far from the best candidate to beat Hillary. I don’t know why people think he is.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
Giuliani is not a conservative. He’s certainly not a libertarian. It’s not even clear that he’s a Republican. He is, essentially, sui generis, and his time and place as mayor of New York City, while admirable and remarkable, has come and gone.

He will not be President of the United States, and he should not be.

Trying to make him the lesser of two evils vis a vis Hillary Clinton entirely misses the point of what it takes to defeat her and Clintonism. You need someone who is opposed to her, not someone who is merely complementary to her.
 
Written By: Martin McPhillips
URL: http://mcphillips.blogspot.com/

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider