Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Still playing the "Chick card" (update)
Posted by: McQ on Monday, November 05, 2007

I posted an article a few days back in which I took Hillary Clinton and her supporters to task for playing the gender card after her tough time on the Holloween eve debate. As I and many others have pointed out, that's an unacceptable argument for a presidential candidate, and especially the front runner.

The reason Hillary Clinton was singled out on that night is she holds a very large lead in the Democratic presidential sweepstakes and those who are trailing her are trying to a) differentiate themselves from her and b) point out why their ideas are superior to hers and thus they should be the pick.

That's the way presidential politics are and have been played. Those behind always attack those who are ahead. There are no exclusions based on gender, race, religion or any other characteristic.

But that isn't stopping others from keeping the "chick card" in play:
“John Edwards, specifically, as well as the press, would never attack Barack Obama for two hours they way they attacked her,” said Geraldine A. Ferraro, the 1984 vice presidential candidate who supports Mrs. Clinton. “It’s O.K. in this country to be sexist,” Ms. Ferraro said.

“It’s certainly not O.K. to be racist. I think if Barack Obama had been attacked for two hours — well, I don’t think Barack Obama would have been attacked for two hours.”
What a load. If Barack Obama was the front runner, I have difficulty believing that Edwards and Clinton wouldn't be spending as much time as they could steal at a debate going after him.

OTOH, what may be happening with the likes of Ferraro and others keeping this alive, is to play a proxie game where Clinton doesn't directly complain but can, in fact, use the issue to her advantage by denying it's a problem:
For all that, Mrs. Clinton has taken pains not to come across as complaining or suggesting that she felt victimized. She told reporters she thought the criticism of her occurred not because she was a woman, but because she was the front-runner, even as she used language that invoked feminist imagery.

“If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen,” Mrs. Clinton said at an event in Indianola, Iowa. “Well, I’m really comfortable in the kitchen, and I’m going to stay in there and absorb the heat.”

Still, her campaign responded, characteristically, on a less obvious and more forceful track that at least initially used an online “piling on” video to encourage a simple story line for the debate: Seven men versus one woman.
The "piling on" video tells me the campaign sees value in the argument. But the statement by Clinton also says the campaign realizes that most Americans feel the way that I do about the subject and consequently Clinton can't complain directly about it. She has to be "strong". Thus the proxies. A classic cross-trump situation. They keep it alive and Clinton denies it and tells us how strong she is. Perfect scripting.

UPDATE: According to ABC, even Nancy Pelosi has figured out the ploy:
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, R-Calif. [sic], said Monday that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., hasn't been treated differently because she's the only woman in the presidential race, but added that her campaign appears to have been trying to exploit that perception in the wake of last week's Democratic debate.
And yes, the "R-Calif" is in the original. Heh ...
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

This is stupid, as all of this campaign stuff is.

The world is a tough place, and the Presidency is more than a series of photo-ops, so if Hiliary can’t take it as much as she seems to like to dish it out in a debate (no less), one has got to wonder just what she would do with adversaries that just don’t respect women at all.

This Ferraro "chick" stuff is about as useful as some "white vs black" comment, and I find them just as vulgar coming from a "tough" feminist. Frankly, it sounds much like I would expect to hear if Martin Luther were selling Indulgences.
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
And yes, the "R-Calif" is in the original. Heh
Layers of editors....
Written By: shark
URL: http://
Ferraro says that in America today, you can get away with being a sexist, but not a racist.

Isn’t this proof that the gender card rhetoric is aimed at white women voters and not black women voters? Perhaps I am wrong, but I imagine many black women who are conflicted between Obama and Hillary would disagree with this statement. It may actually be an offensive and/or borderline racist statement. I can’t imagine the Clinton machine will continue repeating it.
Written By: You might want to read the article again
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks