Precisely. And, it’s a point I made last week. You know, for every other organization on the planet this kind of a fabrication, would cause a serious credibility problem; serious enough to cause an organization to be discounted when they make such pronouncements about AGW, and Aids and whatever else. For some reason, however, the United Nations gets a pass. |
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
|
Well it doesn’t surprise me that the UN looks incompetent once again, but that is good news that the spread of AIDS has slowed a bit. Even so, my God the poor Africans are still being hit hard with this! |
| |
Written By:
John
URL:
http://averagegayjoe.blogspot.com
|
|
For those of who read references such as "The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS" (published back in 1989!), this comes as no surprise. It’s long been clear that the counting methodologies were more political than scientific. |
| |
Written By:
Billy Hollis
URL:
http://
|
|
Never heard of this book, but of course I rarely read much on the subject anyways to be honest. If this book skewers radical AIDS activists, like ACT-UP, for their shenanigans that’s a good thing IMO. However, the title is a bit disturbing for while in the USA gays who foolishly indulge in hedonism are the majority of cases, that’s not true for all cases or the majority throughout the world. Eh, if it’s a call to use the head on your shoulders before giving into momentary gratification that’s good. I don’t believe the good Lord ever intended sex to be a recreational activity one can partake in with as many partners as they please. |
| |
Written By:
John
URL:
http://averagegayjoe.blogspot.com
|
...that’s not true for all cases or the majority throughout the world. The book was focused on the US (which was where most of the action on AIDS was at that point in time) and did not say heterosexual transmission was unknown - just that the rates of heterosexual transmission were very, very low and the disease was heavily concentrated in the gay, bi, and drug-using communities. One of the book’s main conclusions was that the danger to the heterosexual community was exaggerated to get more funding for AIDS research and education. Tracking heterosexual rates of transmission in America in the ensuing years suggests he was probably correct. |
| |
Written By:
Billy Hollis
URL:
http://
|
|
Beats me, since I don’t live my life making whoopee like bunnies with multiple hares I haven’t followed this closely. I would caution anyone though regardless of sexuality to be careful in whom they choose to engage in...shall we say extracurricular activities with. As far as funding goes, this wouldn’t surprise me as things with far higher rates, like cancer and heart disease, aren’t funded as they should be. Pity. |
| |
Written By:
John
URL:
http://averagegayjoe.blogspot.com
|