Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

How bad is it?
Posted by: McQ on Sunday, December 09, 2007

Apparently pretty bad. Byron York reports:
Brian De Palma's "Redacted," the Iraqi war movie that won the best director prize at the Venice Film Festival but has been dismissed as loathsome and awful in other circles, has been in theaters – okay, 15 theaters – nationwide for three weeks now. According to BoxOfficeMojo, during that time it has grossed a total of $60,456 domestically.
3 weeks (21 days) times 15 theaters equals 315 showings (at a minimum - I know films get multiple showings per day per theater, but go with me on this). $60,456/315 = $191.19 per day per theater. What's that, 20 to 25 people a day? Heck, that won't pay the salaries of the kids behind the concession stand for the day.

I'd say that qualifies as a flop.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

It will get an Oscar nomination if not the Oscar itself for one of the categories.

Unfortunately that will probably re-energize it financially somewhat.
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
I’d simply say that this is a case of "Casting your pearls before swine." He won a Palm D’Or for Jeebus’ SAKE!?!?! Wake Up Sheeple, it is a GREAT film...A Frick’n PALM D’OR! Plus, Cuban has had some HAWT dance partners....
Written By: Joe
URL: http://
You know what movie was good, at least when it came to the military?


I’m not saying it was a good movie. It was what it was which is the movie version of a cartoon designed exclusively to sell toys. But it didn’t suffer from the need to be relevant either, and if you want to suffer, a movie trying to be relevant will do it.

The military guys in it were heroic and the military itself competent.

I’m a bit confused and torn between declaring that the military unit details were really screwed up and watching it again with attention to uniforms to see if the seemingly mixed unit was actually right even if they never explained the weirdness. I’d heard they filmed part of the movie at an Air Force base here in New Mexico and the AF uniforms might have been part of the deal and who cares if it’s not accurate? But the surviving unit in the movie could have been forward air control attached to a special forces unit. So I suppose I’ll have to watch it again instead of halfway through realizing the uniforms were very strange.
Written By: Synova
Yeah, but they’ll make a lot of money in Turkey, Saudi Arabia, etc.
Written By: tom scott
URL: http://
Tom Scott,

I bet they don’t make much money in those countries. Maybe in Europe.

People in most parts of the world want action films or comedies, not political claptrap.
Written By: Harun
URL: http://
Harun-This is what I was referring to. And it’s also true of other anti-American films. Granted, this film is not an American film-just American stars. But look at this gross for Lions for Lambs.
Written By: tom scott
URL: http://

Lions for Lambs was shown in Taiwan (it lasted maybe two weeks?) and I saw the ads for it on TV. From the ads, it looked like an action movie with some taught tension in Washington.

It was not billed as an anti-war film.

Sure, it made money here, off the backs of unsuspecting movie goers who were expecting something totally different.

But yes, these political movies do seep into the consciousness here, too. It really sucks.
Written By: Harun
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks