Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Is Bill Clinton really a campaign asset?
Posted by: McQ on Monday, December 17, 2007

While many believe he is, there are, I believe, a growing number who are tiring of him. Alex Beam of the Boston Globe is one of them:
In 1999, after almost seven years of Bill Clinton's rule, the commentariat christened a new buzzterm: Clinton fatigue. The peccadilloes, the double-dealing, the outright lying had overwhelmed the American public. "The Clintons have finally worn out their welcome," wrote columnist Linda Bowles. "There is a prevailing sentiment that it's time for them to go, and to take their baggage with them."
more stories like this

Clinton fatigue. With the presidential election less than 11 months away, I am feeling it already.

I'm not talking about Mrs. Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Senator Clinton, Hillary Rodham, or whatever she is choosing to call herself for this news cycle. She's no different from every intelligent, overachieving, soulless corporate lawyer I've ever known. She's far from boring, and as unprincipled as she needs to be. Trotting out Bill Shaheen to slime Obama with the drug smear - slick work, Hill! You're more than ready to knife-fight with the big boys.

My Clinton fatigue is about Bill. I am getting sick of him.
I wondered aloud about this last night on our podcast. When Bill Clinton ran in 1992, we weren't aware of what we were getting and so the campaign had a pretty free run. 4 years later, while mostly aware of the Clinton machine and, as Beam says, the "peccadilloes, the double-dealing, the outright lying", the choice was a known incumbent in a relatively decent era or Bob Dole. So the voters kept Clinton in the White House but were treated to even more in the way of "peccadilloes, the double-dealing, the outright lying."

Bill's return to the campaign trail reminds us again of that era, which, for most, in personal terms, wasn't that bad, but, politically, left a bad taste in everyone's mouth.

Now Hillary, using the same campaign machine, is trying to run a third campaign, and since Bill has joined it in earnest, that bad taste has returned. I think Clinton fatigue is indeed beginning to set in. And while Bill Clinton is doing his level best to characterize Hillary as an "agent of change", it's not selling. Bill's addition to the campaign is reminding voters that the Clintons come as a package and what they're getting is not change, but the return of the old guard. The mantle of "change agent" has gone to Obama and I think, if the polls are any indication, the "Bill factor" may not be the asset everyone thinks he is. It is fostering the question: do we really want to do this again? And polls seem to be telling us the answer may be 'no'.

Of course all of this is also a function of the perceived electoral viability of the other Democratic candidates - but, per the polls, it seems Obama is beginning to be considered a very viable candidate (and IA and NH could cement that assessment). If there isn't a viable candidate in the field, then, of course, you would expect Dems to hold their nose and vote for Hill (you know, one of those "embarrassment of riches" candidates Ellen Goodman wrote about this past week). Falling poll numbers for her seem to indicate perceptions are changing.
Hillary's campaign clearly views husband Bill as an asset. Others, including the Globe's Joan Vennochi, aren't so sure. But here is a more intriguing angle, suggested by Herald columnist Margery Eagan: Is Bill "The Underminer," as defined by the hilarious book of the same name by Mike Albo and Virginia Heffernan? The underminer is your "friend" who waxes enthusiastic about your fabulous trip to New Zealand, and then lets slip that he was hang-gliding there in the early 1980s, you know, before all the American tourists arrived.
That brings us to an email by a listener to our podcast - Tim in VA. He wonders, given Clinton's seeming obsession with his legacy:
Why do we assume that Bill Clinton wants Hillary to win the White House?

It seems to me that there is more down side for him than up.

Consider the possible outcomes:

1. Hillary is a good to great President; Bill’s legacy is diminished as folks wonder if the good of the early presidency was her doing.

2. Hillary is a mediocre to lousy President; every mistake and scandal of the early presidency is resurrected.

3. The two of them craft some kind of co-Presidency and exist in between mediocre and good; his earlier presidency still comes out looking “less than”.

Bill Clinton has shown himself to be a pathological narcissist, who cannot bear to see the spotlight diverted from him. I don’t see how he can let her take the office and risk losing that spotlight.
Tim's suggestion seems to line up with Margery Eagan's "the underminer" theory. Is Bill Clinton really on Hillary's side in all of this or is Bill concerned, even unconsciously, that given the international situation and the possibilities outlined by Tim above, that he could risk becoming the overshadowed and lesser Clinton if Hillary wins?

Interesting questions all.

What say you?
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Does Bubba really want to be known as "The Man".

What "First Black President" wants to be on the receiving end of "Sticking it to "The Man" ?
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Bob Kerry endorses "an unusually good liar. Unusually good. Do you realize that?"

This must be satire.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
What a loopy character Bob Kerrey is. Honest to God.

As far as whether Bill Clinton helps Hillary, he’s good at injecting live fear into any Iowa or New Hampshire Democrat opposing her, or any campaign manager or staffer who appears not to have his thumb on the scale while selling her.

But if the Clintons really fear Obama is going to take their return tickets away from them, Obama’s old biography, where he did a modified limited hangout on his drug use, that’s likely to get fleshed out with the truth, or maybe there’s an illegitimate child out there in the bushes. All the kinds of things that might have come out, you know, about Bill Clinton, had the press not refused to look.

When the knockout punch comes, it will be unmistakeable, and Obama will go to the canvas really fast.

I’m just sayin’.
 
Written By: Martin McPhillips
URL: http://mcphillips.blogspot.com/
If those two could have Obama dropped down and a well and get away with it, they would.

As for the former First Grapple: He will happily trade the long run in history for the short-term of reflected limelight if She gets in.
 
Written By: Billy Beck
URL: http://www.two—four.net/weblog.php
Bill’s return to the campaign trail reminds us again of that era, which, for most, in personal terms, wasn’t that bad, but, politically, left a bad taste in everyone’s mouth.
Must... resist...obvious...joke...

 
Written By: abw
URL: http://abw.mee.nu
The bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral.
 
Written By: Greg Hlatky
URL: http://borzoiblog.com
If his is a narcissist, I suspect he is thinking more short term than his legacy. He’s scheming about what happens when Hill wins. What position he will take, what kind of grandstanding he will do, how many interns he can secure (no fat ugly ones this time!)
 
Written By: Harun
URL: http://
I kind of assumed he liked the fat ugly ones.
 
Written By: JorgXMcKie
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider