Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Experience? How much does Hillary really have?
Posted by: McQ on Friday, December 28, 2007

If you believe the NY Times, it may not be at all as extensive as she likes to claim during those 8 years at Bill's side in the White House:
But during those two terms in the White House, Mrs. Clinton did not hold a security clearance. She did not attend National Security Council meetings. She was not given a copy of the president’s daily intelligence briefing. She did not assert herself on the crises in Somalia, Haiti and Rwanda.

And during one of President Bill Clinton’s major tests on terrorism, whether to bomb Afghanistan and Sudan in 1998, Mrs. Clinton was barely speaking to her husband, let alone advising him, as the Lewinsky scandal sizzled.
My guess is, most of Hillary's time was spent advising on the politics of situations (well, obviously, minus the Lewinsky scandal) and not as much on policy as she'd like to have people believe. And, although I wouldn't put it past Bill Clinton to pass on classified information to her even without a security clearance, there's not much of any role you can play in policy advice in the White House without one.
An interview with Mrs. Clinton, conversations with 35 Clinton administration officials and a review of books about her White House years suggest that she was more of a sounding board than a policy maker, who learned through osmosis rather than decision-making, and who grew gradually more comfortable with the use of military power.
My experience says that advising doesn't really prepare you for the decision making part of a job. But it certainly does allow you to observe the process and how it works. If that counts for "experience" she's going to have to do some mighty spinning to make that a palatable argument. How she'll do that while deflecting Obama's claim that you can't be an agent for change when you're part of the entrenched "problem" will be entertaining to say the least.

It'll be interesting to see how the Clinton campaign addresses these points, if they do at all.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 


Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks