Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
I know, I know ... it’s my fault
Posted by: McQ on Monday, January 07, 2008

Damn bloggers:
Not everyone is thrilled about how new technology has changed the way news is reported. Long-time White House Press Corp member and columnist for Hearst newspapers Helen Thomas is one of those unhappy. She blames bloggers for contributing to the “deterioration” of journalism that led to the Iraq war.

“What I really worry about is that I think the bloggers and everyone, everyone with a laptop thinks they’re journalists,” Thomas said. “And, they certainly don’t have our standards. They don’t have our ethics, and so forth.
Thank goodness.

And, since the left usually is irony impaired, Ms. Thomas is kind enough to prove she's no exception:
There’s a deterioration,” she continued. “Reporters laid down on the job in the run up to this [the Iraq] war.”

[...]

“I think they did a lousy job and we’re making for it now because the questions that should have been asked were not asked and because of 9/11 and the fear of being called unpatriotic, un-American and so forth. We let the country down,” Thomas added.
So much for those vaunted standards and ethics, huh Helen?

And so forth ...
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
I know! The solution is to impose standards!

These people really can’t accept the decline of their profession. They’re just incapable of looking their own limitations in the face, even those that have been with journalists as long as I’ve been alive.

And of course, I’d bet Helen Thomas doesn’t think she’s a bit biased, despite her clear cut case of BDS.
 
Written By: Billy Hollis
URL: http://
Billy,

Helen isn’t biased. She is simply right, and those who oppose her views are wrong.
 
Written By: Don
URL: http://
Of course, while a minority bloggers try to create an alternative reality about Iraq that somehow paints things as rosey and worth the effort (though the public isn’t buying it), reality paints a different picture.
 
Written By: Scott Erb
URL: http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/~erb/blog.htm
Yeah, Doc...just because this last two months have been the lowest death rate since the invasion...and I might add that it was ANTICIPATED that the loss rate would increase as a result of the surge...

So, the surge results in very low casualties since its completion...and it’s a failure.
Had the surge operated as conventional wisdom expected, casualties would have increased and again...it would be a failure.

Man as I say, this Progressive thing is easy...no matter what happens, we lose and it’s BUSH’S FAULT!

I might note, also that after June TOTAL casualties, Iraqi civilian and US military have fallen dramatically, but let’s don’t look at that...of course this is "fun with stat’s" isn’t it Doc? Average values versus MEDIAN or MODAL values... also what will you and the Independent do next year, I mean after we have to figure in these low figures in then if there’s a spike well then it gets lost in the statistics...OH THAT"S RIGHT, we’ll just ignore the last half of ’07 because it doesn’t support our theses.
 
Written By: Joe
URL: http://
That’s right Scotty. Iraq is falling apart.......that’s why we have the sudden deafening silence about it, in the midst of a presidential campaign to boot.

 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
I note that Erb has to cite a foreign source to get the spin he desires. Evidently the American main stream press is still doing as lousy a job as Helen Thomas says.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
The surge in troop numbers began well before June. In fact, the increase in force levels ended in June, most of the deaths occured during the surge. After that, there was a drastic change in policy when the commanders starting using the ’clear and hold’ strategy’; but that doesn’t change the fact that the surge itself failed. Nothing they did after that can make it seem like a success.
 
Written By: Ted
URL: http://
Damn, McQ broke truth, justice, and the American Way.

I bet Henke and Franks put him up to it.
 
Written By: Terry
URL: http://
On a more upbeat note:

Now that ya’ll know you have the power to destroy an entire industry with just your stern disapproval, what next? Or shoukd that be who’s next?
 
Written By: Terry
URL: http://
After that, there was a drastic change in policy when the commanders starting using the ’clear and hold’ strategy’;
That was part of the Surge plan. It wasn’t just add soldiers, but a complete change in strategy...

 
Written By: Harun
URL: http://
Erb ONCE AGAIN proves that he is only interested in his narrative rather than the facts.

From his citation:
The research comes from Iraq Body Count (IBC)
Here’s the actual data that Erb doesn’t bother to look at himself.

In reality, the civilian death rate outside of Bagdad is doing EXACTLY THE SAME THING as inside of Bagdad. It is going down month by month.

The first statement from the citation:
...figures that appear to contradict American claims that the troop "surge" has dramatically reduced the level of violence across the country.
is a lie.

The violence in Bagdad has dropped faster then the violence outside of Bagdad, so Erb is forced to spin and link to distortions.

Typically pathetic.
 
Written By: JWG
URL: http://
Yes, things are not rosy. But then, nobody is claiming that. What is being claimed is that things are improving.

In fact, the deaths have been going down since May for soldiers, and since July for civilians. And they are both below historic monthly averages since September.

And might I add, that deaths are going down when people keep saying they historically go up (ie during the cooler winter months.)

I’ve put these in a chart in this post...

http://asecondhandconjecture.com/?p=1978
 
Written By: Keith_Indy
URL: http://asecondhandconjecture.com
Harun;
I’m well aware of that. I was just trying to test for myself Joe’s claim that this form of being "progressive" is easy. Between holding down my breakfast while ignoring simple facts and restraining myself from using logic; I would have to disagree with Joe and say it was difficult to leave that post as is without adding too much sarcasm. Maybe it becomes easier over time, I don’t want to find out.
 
Written By: Ted
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider