|
So I take it that Steinem is a racist for not supporting Obama? |
| |
Written By:
Jimmy the Dhimmi
URL:
http://www.warning1938alert.ytmnd.com
|
|
Although with Edwards, the line "I’m not voted because she’s a woman" could be used without a whole lot arguement... :) |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
|
I’m always amazed when Feminists (gender terrorists) complain about how bad women have it here in America. Perhaps American Feminists should go spend some time in the Middle East before they decide to demonize all American Men (see IMBRA). If they think America and American Men are against women, they really are beyond help. Seriously, American women are the most privileged group in the history of the world. They are the safest, the most pampered, and with the most options available to them of any group (including those horrible members of the "patriarchy") the world has ever seen. Despite this fact, their "voice" is now a shrill cacophony of loud complaints that is heard above all others. This cannot be refuted, though attempts will be made, with the usual pseudo Feminist "Facts", Lies, and talking points that have been debunked for ages now. |
| |
Written By:
poboy
URL:
http://
|
Among the reasons she gives for supporting Clinton over Obama - who she’s careful to claim she’s "not opposing" - are that Clinton has "no masculinity to prove" as well as "the courage to break the no-tears rule."
Good lord.
Gloria, if you really want to do something worthwhile, say, for all the women in America or something, I suggest you go have a nice lie-down and just STFU.
Incidentally, in the time it took me to click from Gloria’s op-ed to another NYT page and then back, the content of her article was altered. When I read it first, it included the claim that Ted Kennedy supported Clinton; a couple of minutes later that claim had been struck and a correction appended.
Like anybody really cares who Steinem or some Kennedy or another supports anyway. |
| |
Written By:
Linda Morgan
URL:
http://
|
And I’m not supporting because she’d be a disaster as president regardless of her gender. In fact that same principle reason covers Edwards and Obama as well. Quite.
And that’s important to this somewhat OT thread, as well; THe crying jag she got into the other day.
She wants to "turn this country around", etc. Is Obama not sufficiently liberal for her taste? In fact, as you point out, Bruce, you can’t fit water between them, policy-wsie. Indeed, the only difference I can see between her and Obama is he’s not HER.
So explain to me how we’re not to question her tears, the other day.
And isn’t it interersting? The standard claim is a sexual double-standard. Yet, we’re not supposed to worry about her tears... she’s just a woman, after all. Anyone remember Ed Muskie? What would the CW that Steinem et al would mouth, if a man... particularly a Republican, had done what Hillary did the other day?
|
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
Would Iron Maggie have got all sniffly over how hard it is to run for Prime Minister?
I don’t think so.
|
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
"Would Iron Maggie have got all sniffly over how hard it is to run for Prime Minister?"
I would love to hear her comments on this. I also can’t imagine Jeanne Kirkpatrick snivelling about how tough it was to be a public servant. |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|
