Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Where is today’s Calvin Coolidge?
Posted by: McQ on Friday, January 25, 2008



(HT: ASHC)
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Wow - that’s awesome. Someone should show this to Hillary... well, I guess any politician these days should see it. A common sense approach to what it costs to ’grow’ the government and who pays it.
 
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
Interesting. I have a book called "Star-Spangled Men: America’s Ten Worst Presidents" and Calvin Coolidge is included. Of course, part of the critique leveled at him in that book (an otherwise partisanship-free enjoyable and informative book) is that he is bad because he was a "do-nothing" president. That’s the kind of unidentified bias history books need to be careful of. The question to be asked after an assertion that he was "do-nothing" is, what is it you wanted him to do? Whether the proposed action is good or bad is a better factor to consider than the mere fact of inaction.
 
Written By: Linus
URL: http://
Sadly, the amount that Republicans and Democrats want to spend is no different, only what they want to spend it on changes.

I was listening to someone earlier this week talking about how all of the lobbyists in Washington are peddling the same old single industry perk tax breaks as economic stimulus packages.

I know a lot of liberals who agree that we should cut down the size and cost of government, and they want to do it by cutting the defense budget to 1 tenth it’s current size. They argue that we managed to meet the challenge of WW1 and WW2 without having a large defense infrastructure, we built it up as needed.

I know the hawks have many good arguments against this, but they are just that, arguments, and liberals have their own arguments for why the social policies should be bigger, not smaller.

In the end, we don’t compromise by spending less on both, we end up compromising by spending more on both, and interest groups and corporations try to work in their own special deals, while the rest of us unrepresented rabble continue to complain, and pay the bill for all of it.

Imagine for a moment that special interest money could be removed from government without violating the First Amendment, and the only voice that mattered to our so-called representatives was our actual votes.

Would the madness stop?

I don’t know, but I would like to see a government where the money to get votes was not more important than the votes themselves.

I don’t care if we spend money on social programs, nor do I care if we spend money on defense, but I do care that we have no semblence of foresight into the impact of the decisions we make today on economic stability of the nation our children will inherit.

Here’s a question though, is there anything you support that you are willing to give up?




 
Written By: Captin Sarcastic
URL: http://
Here’s a question though, is there anything you support that you are willing to give up?
Need a bit more context - for example I have limited support for short term additional stimulus rebates in the current (this week) package - I’ll get like $1500 - I’d give that up in a heartbeat if they’d take Jumbo mortgages back out of the new FHA (etc.) federal support.

It’s scary that the Gov. will insure my savings to only 100K but will insure a deadbeat loan to 700K...

There are lots of things I support I’m willing to give up as long as it’s not unilateral - take away NIH Diabetes research money that I support but also take everyone elses - so are there things I support that I’d give up - yes as long as it’s not unilateral.
 
Written By: BIllS
URL: http://bills-opinions.blogspot.com

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider