Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
FYI
Posted by: Dale Franks on Sunday, January 27, 2008

Playing with the QandO Electoral Vote Counter, I looked up some historical info. Looking over the last four elections, a number of states have voted for the same party in all elections since 1992.

long-term voting patterns

The blue states have, of the most part, been solidly blue for the last 16 years. Thats a total of 248 electoral votes for a Democrat candidate right from the get-go. The solid red states total 135 electoral votes.

So, let's look, then, at states which have voted for the same party in 3 of the last 4 elections.

long-term voting patterns

The remaining states in gray have split their votes between Republican and Democratic candidates voting D twice and R twice. They are the battleground states. Counting the leaners, however, Dems still lead 257-199 in electoral votes.

So, the worst-case scenario for the Democrat candidate is that 22 electoral votes are needed to put them over the top. Best case, based on historical votes, is that they are only 13 electoral votes short. All they need is a win in Ohio, or failing that, any of the two other eastern swing states.

In other words, Republicans have to win Ohio, and pretty much every other eastern state.

It really depends on the candidates, of course, but the Dems sure start out with an advantage.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Didn’t SC go for Kerry in 2004 which would not make them 4 or 3 year red or am I off on that?
 
Written By: SlimGuy
URL: http://
You’re off on that.
 
Written By: Dale Franks
URL: http://www.qando.net
Can you change the background on that so that the blue Democratic lettering is readable?
 
Written By: Ben
URL: http://www.qando.net/details.aspx?entry=7695

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider