Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Follow the Money - part XVII
Posted by: McQ on Friday, February 01, 2008

A whole different sort of voting going on out there:
Sens. Clinton of New York and Obama of Illinois continued their fundraising dominance in the fourth quarter of last year. Clinton brought in $26.8 million, while Obama raised $22.8 million.

Compare that to the GOP candidates, none of whom came close to matching either Democrat.

McCain, the Arizona senator who has emerged as the front-runner, raised $6.8 million, but had to take out a loan to keep his campaign afloat. Romney, the wealthy former Massachusetts governor, brought in $9 million in contributions, but loaned his campaign twice that amount. Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, raised $6.6 million. And topping the field with an impressive $19.7 million raised in the fourth quarter was Paul, the libertarian-leaning Texas congressman, though he barely registers in polls.
Check out the Paul numbers vs. the Republican "front runner". Has to give you a chuckle. And, of course each of the Dems have raised 4 to 5 times the money raised than McCain. The only Rep close is Paul, who manages much more money than percentage of primary votes.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
I think it’s fairly well known that the voting turnout has also been much lower for Republicans so far. Both situations underscore the "meh" or worse that Republicans are feeling about these candidates. Paul is the exception because his supporters, few though they may be, are passionate. If you know what I mean.
 
Written By: Linus
URL: http://
This feeds my notion that Paul ran the campaign he ran, highlighting the issue he highlighted, for the money.

He sacrificed electability for cash. Even if he can’t use it directly, that’s quite a piggybank he has some influence over.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
Ron Paul was never really electable — he’d never pull a Romney and change his positions to match the polls. But he might win Maine this weekend — I wouldn’t say it likely, but he has a shot. As goes Maine...
 
Written By: Scott Erb
URL: http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/~erb/blog.htm
What you are seeing is the result of the complete abandonment of the small government platform by both the white house and the Republicans in congress.

The irony is that they abandoned limited government in an effort to be popular, when in reality it was the only issue that Republicans ever had (besides anti-communism) that ever made them popular.

 
Written By: kyleN
URL: http://impudent.blognation.us/blog

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider