Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

California Voting Summary
Posted by: Dale Franks on Saturday, February 02, 2008

Once again, it's time to look over the California voting guide and see what's what. A number of propositions are on the ballot, so let's take a look at them.


Proposition 91: Transportation Funds
Vote: No
Summary: The purpose of this proposition is to prevent the state from using money from the gas tax for bein g used in the general fund. As it happens, this proposition was actually promulgated a while back, and just now made it onto the ballot. In the interim, the Governor and the legislature put in a legislative proposition 1A on the ballot which did essentially the same thing. That proposition passed by a 77% approval. So, even the original proponents are urging people to vote no, since this has already been accomplished.

Proposition 92: Community College Funding, Governance, & Fees
Vote: No
Summary: This proposition would provide a separate funding line for community colleges in the education budget, reduce fees from $20 to $15 per credit hour. Ultimately, this would impose an additional mandate of $300 million per year to K-12 education, while, at the same time, reducing fee revenues from community colleges by about $70 million. It also expands the governing board. Oh, basically it does a whole bunch of crap that either a) doesn't need to be done, or b) spends money that doesn't need to be spent.

Proposition 93: Legislative Term Limits
Vote: No
Summary: Ostensibly, this law will reduce the total amount of time a person may serve in the state legislature from 14 years to 12 years, and allow a person to serve a total of 12 years either in the Assembly, the Senate, or a combination of both. That would be a reduction from the current 14-year limit. contains a "transition period" for current politicians, allowing them to serve for another 12 years after passage. Basically, it's a scam for current politicians to avoid being term-limited out. Most of the newspapers in California have called the proposition a fraud. It would also actually lengthen terms, since you can serve 12 years in a single house, instead of the current 6-year limitation for the Assembly and 8-year limitation in the Senate.

Propositions 94, 95, 06, and 97: Indian Gaming
Vote: Yes
Summary: These four propositions are actually a bloc of propositions, which would allow an expansion of casino gaming—about 3,000 slot machines apiece, specifically, for four different tribes. Let the tribes have casinos. Oh, there's the usual wingeing from the California Teacher's Association, like "Why do they promise more education revenues when NOT ONE PENNY OF IT IS GUARANTEED TO OUR SCHOOLS?" We're forgetting The Children, don't you know. Unions are against it. So are tree-huggers. "Oh, it's unfair! It doesn't make the tribes pay enough money to the state! Waaaah!" Cry me a river.


So, not a lot of really important stuff on the ballot, but, I couldn't let the election go past without running through the propositions.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Prop 92 also does what I think Prop 1 set up and did in like 2005...

I know that the people who PUSHED for Prop 92 are even saying "vote no, it’s redundant"...
Written By: Scott Jacobs
URL: http://
Loved your line
"Oh, basically it does a whole bunch of crap that either a) doesn’t need to be done, or b) spends money that doesn’t need to be spent." Which, from my experience living in CA means, it absolutely, positively, will pass.
Written By: Clark Taylor
URL: http://
This non Californian is curious how the community college proposition would turn out to be an unfunded mandate for K-12? Is that simply because it takes away money from K-12, or something deeper?

Also, how do you think the proposition votes will play into the presidential primaries. Florida’s Amendment 1—which was a tax cutting proposal opposed by a slew of government employee unions and municipal governments [and it’s so complicated it might end up not being a tax cutting measure at all]—was passed by a supermajority ( a requirement since the last set of elections). Gov. Crist was the main person campaigning for Amendment 1—so its passage is a big personal win for him; and it’s quite possible that without it, turnout would have been much less, and neither Clinton nor McCain would have emerged as victors in Florida.
Written By: kishnevi
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks