Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Super Delegates - Seemingly Clinton’s only chance
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, February 14, 2008

And, as expected, she'll do whatever it takes to corral enough of them if you believe her spokesman:
But Clinton will not concede the race to Obama if he wins a greater number of pledged delegates by the end of the primary season, and will count on the 796 elected officials and party bigwigs to put her over the top, if necessary, said Clinton's communications director, Howard Wolfson.

"I want to be clear about the fact that neither campaign is in a position to win this nomination without the support of the votes of the superdelegates,'' Wolfson told reporters in a conference call.

"We don't make distinctions between delegates chosen by million of voters in a primary and those chosen between tens of thousands in caucuses,'' Wolfson said. "And we don't make distinctions when it comes to elected officials'' who vote as superdelegates at the convention.

"We are interested in acquiring delegates, period,'' he added.
Pretty darn straight-forward, isn't it? And, of course, the campaign wants FL and MI delegates seated as is - no do overs.

But if the Clinton strategy rests on Super Delegates, she may be in more trouble than she knows according to Ron Fournier:
The remaining 796 delegates are elected officials and party leaders whose votes are not tied to state primaries or caucuses; thus, they are dubbed "superdelegates."

And they are not all super fans of the Clintons.

Some are labor leaders still angry that Bill Clinton championed the North American Free Trade Agreement as part of his centrist agenda.

Some are social activists who lobbied unsuccessfully to get him to veto welfare reform legislation, a talking point for his 1996 re-election campaign.

Some served in Congress when the Clintons dismissed their advice on health care reform in 1993. Some called her a bully at the time.

Some are DNC members who saw the party committee weakened under the Clintons and watched President Bush use the White House to build up the Republican National Committee.

Some are senators who had to defend Clinton for lying to the country about his affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Some are allies of former Vice President Al Gore who still believe the Lewinsky scandal cost him the presidency in 2000.

Some are House members (or former House members) who still blame Clinton for Republicans seizing control of the House in 1994.

Some are donors who paid for the Clintons' campaigns and his presidential library.

Some are folks who owe the Clintons a favor but still feel betrayed or taken for granted. Could that be why Bill Richardson, a former U.N. secretary and energy secretary in the Clinton administration, refused to endorse her even after an angry call from the former president? "What," Bill Clinton reportedly asked Richardson, "isn't two Cabinet posts enough?"

And some just want something new. They appreciate the fact that Clinton was a successful president and his wife was an able partner, but they never loved the couple as much as they feared them.

Never count the Clintons out. They are brilliant politicians who defied conventional wisdom countless times in Arkansas and Washington. But time is running out.
An amazing situation for the person all thought would waltz into the nomination a few short months ago. It's even reduced Bill Clinton to whining about press coverage and politics of personal destruction, something of which he is intimately familiar:
CLINTON: – to refer to my daughter in the way he did. It was representative of the kind of blatant, careless, crass, cruel remarks that are altogether too common. And I wouldn’t use disrespectful language referring to General Petraeus or anybody else. But I think that it is remarkable how many sexist things have been said in this campaign that have not been reprimanded. Hillary never complains when people say things about her or me. But when he involved my daughter, she complained, and I think it was the right thing to do.
Yeah, well, I think you ought to put a little ice on it, Bill. It'll be all right.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

But when he involved my daughter, she complained, and I think it was the right thing to do.
But when you pull the cigar trick on someone else’s daughter.....then it’s quite alright I guess.
Written By: shark
URL: http://
So, the best case scenario is Hillary wins the nomination through the superdelegate vote. Obama supporters stay home in November, and John Mccain wins the presidency. John McCain - best case scenario.
Written By: Is
URL: http://
John McCain - best case scenario.
Wow - isn’t that inspiring! /not
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
Obama would be great, if not, I’d rather have Mcain than Clinton. Her health care plan is a disaster for our individual liberty. I believe that everyone has the right to choose whats best for their own body. Whether we agree with those decisions or not, the government does not have the right to force us to buy anything.

Exercise, and eating a healthy diet are just as important to good health as having health insurance. So what’s next? Mandatory Gym memberships? Mandatory diet plans? Think it won’t happen? Thirty years ago people would have laughed if you told them that the government is going to force them to buy health coverage.

Is buying health insurance a good idea? I think so, but it’s your choice, your money, and your body. Hillary has made it clear that she intends to impose this ’idea’ upon us, threatening to ’garnish wages’ for those who do not comply.
Written By: kirk
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks