Fiscal responsibility for the dems has always meant taxing (the wealthy) enough to pay for all their programs. I have no idea what it means for the GOP. I don’t think they do either.
|
| |
Written By:
Grimshaw
URL:
http://
|
Almost unbidden, I’d like to see figures expressed as % of GDP, etc.
Imagine a man with a million dollars of debt. What a fool and wastrel!
Did I mention he is worth 100 million, and has an income of 2 million per year?
While I understand the need for fiscal responsibility, I primarily support it simply because government is not as efficient as the private sector, but absolute numbers don’t really tell you much. |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
they’re not shy about claiming this administration has been anything but fiscally responsible. I find it hard to argue with their latter point: Perhaps, but how much of that is really in Bush’s control? I suppose he could draw a line in the sand, and demand a budget that is balanced, but if he did I suspect that he would have ended up with a big budget fight, and that would have drawn the focus and energy away from the war on Islamic terror.
In short, I think Bush is simply picking his battles. Not always the best choices, but not always bad ones, either. |
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
Why should they be specific? They won the 2006 elections based on vague promises of running things ’better & smarter’.
|
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
|
According to my Dem glossary, "fiscal responsibility" is defined as "cutting the defense budget and going spend-crazy on just about everything else." So I guess their message is consistent with their actions. |
| |
Written By:
the wolf
URL:
http://
|