Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Sometimes you can just over-analyze something
Posted by: McQ on Saturday, March 01, 2008

And that seems to be the case with a bunch of feminists who got together to discuss Hillary, Barack, progressive politics and the state of feminism for The Nation. First noting that while they were "diverse" they were all "progressive" (yay for that), they all wondered why it was that the selection process for the Democrats was in such a state. Typically, they define the problem in terms they understand, whether applicable or not:
Rather, the concern that united us all was the "race-gender split" playing out nationally, in which the one is relentlessly pitted against the other. We did not want to see a repeat of the ugly history of the nineteenth century, when the failure of the women's movement to bring about universal adult suffrage metastasized into racial resentment and rift that weakened feminism throughout much of the twentieth century.

How, we wondered, did a historic breakthrough moment for which we have all longed and worked hard, suddenly risk becoming marred by having to choose between "race cards" and "gender cards"?
Well, the answer is very simple actually. Because that is the sort of identity politics to which "progressives" are prone.

To the rest of us out here, this isn't a big mystery. It has nothing really to do with race or gender. It has to do with one candidate being more attractive to "progressive" voters than the other. And had it have been the female instead of the black man, none of the soul searching and analysis about the "gender card" would be found anywhere, would it?

Nope - instead it would all be about racist America not ready for a black president.

However, the one part of the analysis that most "progressives" seem to continue to miss, at this point, is that these have been "progressive" primaries, not a general election. So any labeling that results stays with "progressives", not the rest of America. I wonder how that's going to sit when they finally realize it.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
I wonder how that’s going to sit when they finally realize it.

You are overestimating their intelligence. There’s no reason to think they will ever realize it.
 
Written By: kishnevi
URL: http://
...the ugly history of the nineteenth century, when the failure of the women’s movement to bring about universal adult suffrage metastasized into racial resentment and rift...
Where do those gals get their history?
How, therefore, to reclaim a common purpose, a truly democratic "we": we women of all races, we blacks of all genders, we Americans of all languages, we immigrants of all classes... [emphasis mine]
And their biology?
 
Written By: Linda Morgan
URL: http://
Kishnevi stole my comment, to which I will only add that if they do realize it, they will rationalize it to somehow be the fault of conservatives, Republicans, neocons or some other hated (by them) group.

 
Written By: Jeff Medcalf
URL: http://www.caerdroia.org/blog
I’ve come to regard feminism the same way I would a $3 bill.

It is kind of a curiosity and interesting to look at once in a while for a chuckle, but all in all it is a novelty.
 
Written By: Nathan
URL: http://
Feminism lost all credibility when they looked the other way during Clinton’s term...
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
You are overestimating their intelligence.
It’s not there intelligence that he’s overestimating, but rather their intellectual honesty (which I think, is Jeff’s point as well).
 
Written By: Marco
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider