Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Why Earmarks are a Problem
Posted by: Jon Henke on Thursday, March 13, 2008

There's been more discussion about earmarks recently, as Democrats have shown a bit of interest in the issue and some Republicans are stepping up, as well. A friend asked yesterday if earmarks were really such a big deal, considering how relatively minor an expenditure they really were, so I think it's worth reiterating the real problems with earmarks.

  1. Earmarks are not a significant fiscal problem – certainly not when compared to entitlements or other programs.

  2. However, earmarks are the primary fulcrum for outside interests to corrupt the legislative process. Earmarks are the source of much of the undue power of individual Congressmen.

  3. Earmarks aren’t just corruption bait, though. They are also an Incumbent Slush Fund, allowing politicians to spread the pelf around their State/District to secure votes and favor. Perhaps we should start counting them as de facto campaign contributions. That’s exactly how they are used.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
#3 is still corruption, it’s corrupting the democratic process.

Earmarks, it’s not the money, it’s the corruption!

Good tag line for the problem.

 
Written By: Keith_Indy
URL: http://asecondhandconjecture.com
Earmarks can go to reward compaign contributers or buy votes.

In the latter case, its not like campaign contributions. It like a successful bribe. A successful bribe requires 2 corrupt individuals.

As long as Congressmen are rewarded by their constituents, earmarks will keep happening.

The only way to eliminate that is to level off the reward. Basically a portion of taxes applied to a state needs to be proportionate to government spending in that state.

A state doesn’t need to pay for the whole program back, but there should be some degree of reciprocity so that voters think twice before rewarding candidates’ earmarks.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
A state doesn’t need to pay for the whole program back, but there should be some degree of reciprocity so that voters think twice before rewarding candidates’ earmarks.
A good idea, but do you think the rest of PA wants to be saddled with Murtha’s earmarks?
 
Written By: meagain
URL: http://
That’s sort of the point.
 
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
This piece of comentary is terrific. It has made me think twice about earmarks.
 
Written By: Retief
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider