Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Public wants politicians to pay attention to polls?
Posted by: McQ on Saturday, March 22, 2008

You've got to be kidding.
In sharp contrast to views recently expressed by Vice President Cheney, a new poll finds that an overwhelming majority of Americans believe government leaders should pay attention to public opinion polls and that the public should generally have more influence over government leaders than it does.
If what is going on in government now isn't enough to make the founders of this nation spin in their graves, this must have them turning enough high-speed revolutions to power a small city.

In essence what is being proposed here is a form of direct democracy (with only the requirement of a simple majority) in which bureaucrats - not political leaders - pull the levers of government to reflect the most recent poll (or fad or trend or, well, you get it). Among a population which, for the most part, can't name their own representative, don't understand the concept of representative government, don't know their own history, can't find most of the countries in the world on a map, have proven consistently that they're mostly ignorant of world affairs and have little or no grounding in economics, this is better than what we have?

BTW, for those of you who think this is a good idea but oppose the war in Iraq - that war was hugely popular at the time it began if you remember the polls.
Eighty-one percent say when making "an important decision" government leaders "should pay attention to public opinion polls because this will help them get a sense of the public's views." Only 18 percent said "they should not pay attention to public opinion polls because this will distract them from deciding what they think is right."
In my opinion, politicians listen too polls to much now. Many have come to substitute them for leadership. Fingers firmly in the air they tend to do what's popular rather than lead and do what they believe to be right. And you see the results of that now.

Personally I'd like to see fewer polls. They're snapshots for heaven sake and, as we've seen, change, sometimes dramatically, as time passes. You might as well form your policy and make your decisions by throwing darts at random options.

Polls are reactions, in many cases, to poorly formed or biased questions aimed, usually unconsciously, at a particular result.

And that's how the majority of this nation thinks we should govern ourselves? Any wonder why a polling company would proudly and widely announce those findings?
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
So I tend to agree that politicians shouldn’t pay attention to opinion polls for a host of reasons - including the fact that the questions and available ’opinion choices’ don’t always reflect the entire range of opinions.

However, I think it would be instructive to "reproduce" the question:-)

Poll Taker:
"Do you think that someone should pay attention to the answers you’ve just given me considering the time you’ve just spent answering my questions or should this information just be fodder for political pundits?"
Apparently 89% think their answers should drive policy as opposed to just supply chaff to the pundit class. The other 11% said that as long as John Stewart references their poll results they are happy...
 
Written By: BillS
URL: http://bills-opinions.blogspot.com/
Hmm.. Horoscopes or the I-Ching may be more impartial than polls, which can be and are jiggered for a predetermined outcome all the time.
 
Written By: M. Murcek
URL: http://
Actually most pre-war polls gave a unilateral invasion only a slim majority. Most polls favored a multilateral approach (which is one of the reasons Bush reluctantly went to the UN). The war didn’t get a strong majority until it had begun, which is understandable.
 
Written By: Oliver Willis
URL: http://www.oliverwillis.com

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider