Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Dem Congressional group attempts to rerun 2006
Posted by: McQ on Friday, March 28, 2008

We know how that turned out as it pertains to Iraq in that election. And that was when Iraq was actually a hot topic.
More than three dozen Democratic congressional candidates banded together yesterday to promise that, if elected, they will push for legislation calling for an immediate drawdown of troops in Iraq that would leave only a security force in place to guard the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.
It's 38 House and 4 senate candidates.

Two points. Point one, as covered in the article:
Rejecting their party leaders' assertions that economic troubles have become the top issue on voters' minds, leaders of the coalition of 38 House and four Senate candidates pledged to make immediate withdrawal from Iraq the centerpiece of their campaigns.

"The people inside the Beltway don't seem to get how big an issue this is," said Darcy Burner, a repeat candidate who narrowly lost to Rep. Dave Reichert (R-Wash.) in 2006.
Well you can see why Ms. Burner came in second in 2006 - and in Washington no less. It's because she doesn't understand that issues which directly effect voters are much more important to them than those which only indirectly effect them. And as Iraq has faded from the headlines, it has also faded from the top of the voter's priority lists. As someone said, Americans may not like war but they'll tolerate it if we're winning. Lately (and we'll see what the latest flare up brings), the perception among most is we're finally winning.

But there is no question, at this point, that the economy is definitely on the radar screen of almost all voters.

The second point consists of three words: United States Senate.

If Dems are unable to get an outright majority of 60, 200 Dem House candidates can make such promises and the minority in the Senate will frustrate them.

But I'd have to agree with the Dem party leaders - not the brightest strategy, at this time, for basing one's Congressional candidacy upon. Especially for House candidates, pocketbook issues are always the most powerful issues they can run on.
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Something you may have not connected this whole group is associated with the Kos slate of candidates for office that the four left side blogs put together of ’progressive’ candidates to run against traditional dem candidates or open seats.

These are the ’blue majority’ candidate slate and none would be considered even mainstream dem.
 
Written By: SlimGuy
URL: http://
http://feeds.dailykos.com/~r/dailykos/index/~3/259230736/115

This is Blue Majority candidate Darcy Burner’s handywork, now in the Washington Post.

More than 40 Democratic House and Senate candidates have endorsed a document stating that "there is no military solution in Iraq" and calling for an end to the war and the removal of all U.S. troops from the country, though not according to any specific timeline.

The strategy document, titled "A Responsible Plan to End the War in Iraq," [PDF] calls for using "diplomatic, political and economic means" to hasten an end to the conflict. As of this writing, it has been endorsed by four Democratic Senate candidates and 38 House hopefuls, a handful of whom touted the plan on a conference call with reporters today [...]

The plan was crafted without the input or endorsement of the House and Senate Democratic leadership. Burner said "this was not driven inside the Beltway" and complained that "people inside the Beltway don’t seem to get how big an issue this is for voters" in the rest of the country.

Guys, this is what we’re fighting for. None of the top party recruits have signed on to this plan. Of course not, those candidates are urged to be cautious and not be bold. So it’s up to us to show that being tough, principled, and outspoken about strong progressive ideals is worth their while.

So far, the plan has been endorsed by Blue Majority candidates Darcy Burner (it’s her plan, after all — what a leader!), Donna Edwards, Eric Massa, Leslie Byrne, and Joe Garcia. I’m sure more will follow.

And aside from those candidates, a great many more Democrats in races all around the country have signed on.

Reward good behavior. Otherwise, the lobbyists and cautious guardians of the status quo win.

We’re at 5,984 supporters. The goal is 6,500 by the end of the month (next Monday).

 
Written By: SlimGuy
URL: http://
I stand corrected only part are the Blue Majority slate.

Will have to look for my list of who composes that select group of progressives and which four websites are linked together. It may be reflected at the fund raising site

http://actblue.com/page/bluemajority

This page will feature candidates selected by DailyKos, OpenLeft, and the Swing State Project whose presence in Congress will make our party stronger.
 
Written By: SlimGuy
URL: http://
The war remains exceedingly unpopular; people aren’t paying as much attention because the headlines have (until this week) not been as dramatic, but there is a growing frustration. People hope the surge works, but that doesn’t equate to support. Still, the Democrat leaders are playing it smart on Iraq — not embracing the surge, but not allowing it to be high on the radar screen. That way, if things go well in Iraq, they won’t be in the unenviable position of basing a strategy on hopes for military failure and will have economic issues to focus upon. However if the latest violence leads to a long, hot, violent summer in Iraq, then they still can go back to that issue closer to the election — after all, despite all the press, most people aren’t really focused yet. If things go south in Iraq, the Democrats will have a landslide.
 
Written By: Scott Erb
URL: http://faculty.umf.maine.edu/~erb/blog.htm

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider