|
Them mos-queet-oes are gonna have to dig out from under some snow up in Seattle... :) |
| |
Written By:
Scott Jacobs
URL:
http://
|
"increases in population density"
That must be a politically correct way of saying they paved paradise and put up a parking lot. Increased population density by itself does nothing but make a target rich environment for the mosquitos, as any epidemiologist would probably say. |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|
Oh ... that and something called DDT. What’s DDT? You know that the only approved method of fighting malaria involves lots and lots of mosquito nets!
Oh yeah...
z1.txt;10;20 |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
I would guess Finland had malaria due to the number of swamps. Of course, hardy pioneers drained a lot of those, but now we have to "protect our fragile wetlands." |
| |
Written By:
Harun
URL:
http://
|
|
It’s just noise to mask out stories like this BBC story. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
Caught this response on another blog to another question but it seemed to fit here.For example, Progressive Democrats of the 1930s would have loved to just substitute Socialism for the reigning economic, political and social mores of the day. This is not as ridiculous as it may sound today since a broad swath of the political elite - including a number of classical economists - believed Socialism to be both “scientific” and “inevitable”. What stood in their way? Not really FDR - look at his attempts to pack the Supreme Court to ram through his programs.
No, what stood in the way were the “values, institutions, and fellow citizens” of America. Given the dramatic failure of the Soviet Union and our understanding of the ruthless repression that evolved there, that America is *extremely* fortunate to have escaped the temptation to just follow the then-current leaders, unconstrained by her values, institutions and fellow citizens. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
It’s just noise to mask out stories like this BBC story. My favorite quote from the BBC story:"When you look at climate change you should not look at any particular year," [the World Meteorological Organization’s secretary-general] said. "You should look at trends over a pretty long period and the trend of temperature globally is still very much indicative of warming". Of course, he has no problem with only citing the surface temperature record and not including the lack of tropospheric and ocean warming. I guess you should only look at global trends if it fits your hypothesis (I mean settled science). |
| |
Written By:
Is
URL:
http://
|
The earth spinning in the opposite direction would cause the sun to rise in the west and set in the east. Syracuse, NY would no longer be the heart of the snowbelt.
That’s not going to happen either. Didn’t I just read that global temperatures are unchanged for the past decade? Oh, the economy is not exactly robust. Let’s take the money we don’t have and fix what isn’t broken. It’s for the children. Kumbaya. Whatever. Maybe we can put those 8800 people Dell is laying off to work killing mosquitos. |
| |
Written By:
MarkD
URL:
http://
|