Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

The Death of Reason
Posted by: Dale Franks on Sunday, April 13, 2008

I really wonder, sometimes, why crackpottery seems so prevalent these days. Case in point, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University.

He's been chosen by the UN to report on human rights issues in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Since he has a long-standing record of anti-Israel bias, this, of course, makes him the perfect UN representative in this matter.

But, he also has other interests.
On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk’s specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the “9-11 official version.”

On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, “It is possibly true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a situation in the country and in the world where something had to happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don’t think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in what really happened than they presently possess.”

Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk, “I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11 truth movement.”

He added, “Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false flag operation is very strong.”
Ah, the 9/11 Truthers. The antithesis to 500 years of rational and skeptical inquiry. Or, perhaps, rational and skeptical inquiry gone haywire.

On the other hand, in Professor Falk's case, it does seem to be less surprising than it is in some.
In a February 16, 1979, op-ed for the New York Times, Mr. Falk praised Ayatollah Khomeini and bemoaned his ill treatment in the American press. He wrote, “The depiction of him as fanatical, reactionary and the bearer of crude prejudices seems certainly and happily false.”
That, my friends, is a singularly keen analysis. No doubt he brings these same intellectual skills to both the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict and the "9/11 Truth" controversies as well.

But, let's not forget that it isn't just lefties that can go off the deep end. back in the 1990s, when I had my radio show in Los Angeles, I used to interview Morgan Reynolds, who was associated with the national Center for Policy Analysis, was an econ professor at Texas A&M, and who had been the Chief Economist for the labor department in the administration of George H.W. Bush.

Sadly, he's now a member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, which is crackpot central.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

I wonder if it isn’t just that the crackpottery is more front and center because the issue of the conspiracy, 9/11, has had more of an impact on our lives than, say, the moon landing. It seems to me it’s made people feel more comfortable sharing their crazy ideas with others.

For instance, yesterday I was at the local public library, and the guy checking out next to me is animatedly engaging the lady in conversation about this excellent movie he’d just seen, which "THEY don’t want you to see". His evidence is that it took two whole weeks after its opening to get to our smaller town. The film? Sweeney Todd. Then, he advised her to read a book he’d just read about the first dog in space, which contained the TRUE story, the one that "THEY don’t want you to hear about", because that story will "change your whole life. I mean, it just tore me up inside, changed my whole life." About the first dog in space. It was obvious this guy didn’t have any hesitation that he, and only he, knew the unvarnished truth. I guess I should have interjected and asked him if he was a professor.
Written By: Bench
URL: http://
Perhaps it’s as simple as this; The Democrats cannot support their position within the bounds of reason, and so move outside those bounds.

Written By: Bithead
The media let the loons out to play to attack Bush and help sway the ’04 elections. It will be a while before the genies are put back in the bottle.

hmmm.... That can be taken as a conspiracy theory, can’t it? Well I don’t think there was a memo. But if it was negative on Bush, the media wasn’t too eager to give it a good debunking.
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
If you do so you will be black listed or your chance is very small to get more booking, Pm9ms Drivers , 604, Shakka Kiwi Liquor , :OOO, Valentin Elisalde , %-), Schlipsknoten , 41589, Nationaltrain , 8-(((, Elvin Haliday Rage , 624363, Eurobeaches , 134, Mg Haodizhi , 097, Compartmentalisation Biosecurity , pusl, Kubota Bx1800 , 8-))), Buyausedcar , 82063,
Written By: Dharma

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks