Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

Trying to stop the bleeding
Posted by: McQ on Friday, April 18, 2008

It is apparent the DNC trauma team and Dr. Dean are more determined than ever to stop the increased bleeding the primary is inflicting on its eventual candidate as they stumble their way into PA and NC:
An increasingly firm Howard Dean told CNN again Thursday that he needs superdelegates to say who they’re for – and “I need them to say who they’re for starting now.”

“We cannot give up two or three months of active campaigning and healing time,” the Democratic National Committee Chairman told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “We’ve got to know who our nominee is.”

After facing criticism for a mostly hands-off leadership style during much of the primary season, Dean has been steadily raising the rhetorical pressure on superdelegates. He said Thursday that roughly 65 percent of them have made their preference plain, but that more than 300 have yet to make up their minds.
There are an increasing number of rumors flying around that Dean is demanding a decision by June the 1st. I imagine that date was one set prior to the "debate" the other night. After watching that debacle, I'd be Dean is probably asking for a decision for tomorrow. Democratic ideals about one man, one vote are obviously now optional.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

That’s odd, I thought the role of the superdelegates was to select a candidate based on the results of the primaries and caucases—not to pre-empt the results of the remaining elections. Am I misunderstanding this? It sounds like Dean is trying to game his own system to achieve an earlier result. Frankly, the Democratice primary system is a complete mess.
Written By: the wolf
URL: http://
Wait....Dean wants the supers. to weigh in now and effectively decide the election? What about the remaining primaries that would be disenfranchised by this? EVERY VOTE COUNTS?????

Yes Wolf, the Dem. primary system Is a complete mess. These are the same F-tards who designed (and couldn’t fill out properly) the infamous "butterfly" ballot in 2000.

They can’t even run their party business properly, they think they can run the country?
Written By: shark
URL: http://
1) How can Howard Dean "Demand" anything of the Super Delegates...Were I one, I’d say "I’ll decide when I decide." There’s no rule or by-law that demands they decide by any particular date, is there?
2) Were I a Super Delegate I don’t know how I’d vote now...I think Clinton stands a better chance in November, but Obama has the most delegates...If you vote for the November candidate you run the risk of splitting the party, because you are saying "F*ck you" to the voters. But a vote for the voter’s choice can lead to a 1972-style tub-thump’n...better to hold off. Mayhap "that Womon" can score some late-minute victories and upsets and close the gap giving cover for a smart Democratic choice.

Bottom-Line: it’s not a requirement and it’s not in the best interests of the Super-Delegates to vote now; why should they?
Written By: Joe
URL: http://

Every vote counts . . . except those in PA, MI, FL, WV, IN, NC, KY, PR, Guam, MT, OR, and SD. Get it?
Written By: Sean
URL: http://
Who decides who is a super delegate? Maybe Dean can at least threaten you with not being a super delegate next time.

A good proportion of them might consider that less threat and more gift, though.
Written By: Jeremy Bowers
Actually, Dr. Dean’s demands dovetail nicely with labor unions’ insistence that votes on unionization proposals be open. Dems want to know who you’re voting for so that if you’re not voting for the "favored" result (whatever that is) there is sufficient time to pound you into the ground for your impudence.

Simple enough, no?
Written By: Greg
URL: http://
Remember who the super delegates are - democrat politicians. They effectively render the entire democrat presidential primary process invalid by saying, "You little people vote for anyone you want, but in the end, we politicians will decide who runs."

Yesterday, I watched a YouTube video of a live poll in a democrat focus group during the Pennsylvania debate. Afterward, Frank Luntz asked the group if they would vote for McCain if their favorite lost. Over half raised their hands.

Howard Dean has been a complete disaster.
Written By: Arch
URL: http://
I’ve just been letting everything pass me by lately. I haven’t been up to much lately. My life’s been dull recently, but that’s how it is. I’ve just been sitting around doing nothing. It’s not important. My mind is like a complete blank.,
Written By: name
URL: link

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks