Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

McCain and Climate Change - One of those issues ...
Posted by: McQ on Saturday, May 10, 2008

This is one of those issues where it doesn't matter which party wins in November, I think Americans end up being screwed:
Sen. John McCain's (R-Ariz.) comments about climate change Friday have sparked a flurry of speculation among national environmentalists, who are now optimistic the presumptive GOP nominee will vote next month for a bill limiting U.S. greenhouse gas emissions.

McCain didn't say for sure whether he would back the bill authored by Sens. Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) and John Warner (R-Va.), both of whom have campaigned actively for him on the trail. But he said they were coming closer to satisfying his concerns about the bill, which is slated for a vote in early June and does not boast the same generous subsidies for nuclear power as the bill McCain and Lieberman co-sponsored in the past.

"I'm pleased in negotiations and discussion with Senator Lieberman that there will be a far more important nuclear component of this legislation that's going to be coming to the floor," McCain said in a press conference at Jersey City's Liberty Science Center. "I hope that it will be passed and I hope that the entire Congress will join in supporting it and the president of the United States would sign it."

McCain has repeatedly pushed hard for nuclear power as one of the primary ways the U.S. can cut its greenhouse gas emissions and reduce its energy dependence on foreign countries. But several Senate Democrats, who back the idea of a mandatory cap on carbon emissions, oppose providing additional subsidies for building nuclear power plants.

McCain advocates cutting U.S. carbon emissions 60 percent by 2050, compared to 1990 levels, while the Lieberman-Warner bill would cut them by nearly 70 percent by mid-century. Both Democratic Sens. Barack Obama (Ill.) and Hillary Clinton (N.Y.) support the bill, though they advocate a more ambitious reduction goal of 80 percent by 2050.
McCain advocates deep cuts ... but not as deep as Democrats.

Whoop freakin' wheee. They will still be monsterously expensive.

No, McCain feels that's all fine, and isn't even that concerned about the depth of cuts if nuclear power is included - somewhat. Somehow.
The question of how drastically the U.S. should limit its carbon emissions does not appear to be a sticking point for McCain, and Lieberman said in an interview yesterday he believed his friend would back the bill once it reaches the floor next month.

"I'm confident that he is going to support the bill," Lieberman said, adding the two men had discussed the matter this morning, and their aides were continuing to work out details of the legislation's nuclear provision.
Can't wait, can you? This is what his grand plan will face while the rest of us are paying through the rear-end for a trace gas:
However Daniel J. Weiss, who directs climate strategy for the Center for American Progress Action Fund, questioned whether the GOP nominee's support would come with too high a price.

"John McCain's reliance nuclear power to solve global warming would require billions of dollars in federal subsidies, millions of gallons of water, and 10 more Yucca Mountains to dispose of all the waste," Weiss wrote in an e-mail. "It is a 20th century solution to a 21st century problem."
And, of course, McCain's support will be used to badger other Republicans to join in:
Jeremy Symons, National Wildlife Federation's global warming campaign executive director, said it could encourage other Republicans to come on board in the weeks to come.
This is a perfect example of the leftward drift of the GOP and its spineless capitulation to a movement which scientifically, seems to be coming apart at the seams. I call it a movement, because given the new science and evidence to the contrary, it certainly is difficult to label it "science."
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

Call it a ’bowel movement’ because its full of sh...

Nah, too easy.
Written By: jpm100
URL: http://
All on the myth of global warming.
Meanwhile, we’ve just had the coldest April for the last 11 years. And oh... how long do sunspot cycles last?

Let me be perfectly clear. I question the ’conservative’ or ’libertarian’ credientials of anyone signing onto the Global warming myth... McCain included. If this is the way the right is going, I say we find another solution.

Written By: Bithead
At what point in time will we be able to start to attack these doomsayers for trying to scare us to death? What if we enter a mini ice age like in the middle ages? Can we sue these bastards?
Written By: kyleN
The envirowhackos need to get these caps in quickly. That way, if the earth does indeed cool down over the next decade they can take credit for it.
Written By: feeblemind
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks