This doesn’t bother me that much. If the GOP can’t get their sh*t together, they don’t deserve to run things.
No more Lincoln Chaffee’s. And no more Denny Hasterts either. |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
i think the gop made a poor choice with mcain and its going to burn them in the long term. he is not a real conservative. |
| |
Written By:
slntax
URL:
http://
|
In fairness, we should remember that their majority was small enough to create much in the way of go-along to et along’ type of stuff... that I note with some irony is the center of Mccain’s campaiging.
Was this shift due to a shift in thinking, or simply a product of trying to keep terrorism under control while facing a lot of nonsense from the Democrats, who took quite a bit to appease them?
|
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
I tend to agree with Bithead. The Republican majority simply didn’t have the clout to get its way. Of course, there is also the problem of RINOs, but they act to further reduce the clout of any slim Republican majority.
The Democrats are currently in a similar situation. They have a slim majority that can’t really deliver what the base wants.
I agree with Ron Paul on many domestic policy issues, but I never saw him as a serious candidate (and I’m not sure how anyone could). The whole Paul campaign looked like a temper tantrum by a bunch of 5 year olds who didn’t get their way. |
| |
Written By:
Don
URL:
http://
|
The Republican majority simply didn’t have the clout to get its way. That would account for failing to pass laws rolling back government and spending. But it totally fails to account for laws that extend government and spending (Medicare Rx, corporate and farm subsidies, steel tariffs, campaign finance reform, federalization of education, earmarks, ad nauseum). A party with any significant number of principled small-government types could and should have blocked those initiatives, because it doesn’t take a majority to do it, just a significant minority.
Ergo, there was no significant number of principled small-government types in the GOP the last eight years. |
| |
Written By:
Billy Hollis
URL:
http://
|
First there is what most would call a fairly mainstream conservative Republican running for the top spot in the Libertarian Party (Bob Barr). Hey, don’t underestimate him. He’s a fairly recent convert. He may still be in that "more libertarian than thou" phase that most Libertarian Party members seem to go through. |
| |
Written By:
Terry
URL:
http://
|
Your article did not mention Dr. Chuck Baldwin, the Nominee of the Constitution Party who beat Alan Keyes by a big "landslide" majoriy of most of the delegates at the Constitution Party National Convention in Kansas City, Missouri.
If you go to Baldwin’s websites: www.ChuckBaldwinlive.com and www.BaldwinBrigade.com you will see many excellent articles that he has written. These excellent articles show his great problem solving knowledge, his great principles, his honesty and reasons why he is truly the best Presidential Candidate for America.
The American Independent Party is the California affiliate of the Constitution Party and we most likely will support the Baldwin-Castle ticket of the Constitution Party!
We must not let the "sour grapes" Alan Keyes losers split up and confuse the voters by their underhanded tactics of "Divide and Conquer" simply because they did not get their way! With too many minor parties, we will accomplish nothing! |
| |
Written By:
Elliott Graham
URL:
http://vacat.us
|
Bithead is right. The Dems. had outright control of the Senate from 2000-2002 and had a de-facto tie from 2002-2006 when you factor in Snowe, Collins, Smith, Chaffee, Specter. They aren’t conservatives. When you factor them in, there was a significant liberal majority in the Senate that turned into a 50-50 situation through ’06. Then throw in Hagel and McCain who could be counted on to vote against conservative legislation and generally get their anti-Bush stances out into the media. The RINO’s in the Senate were the reason that the tax cuts contained the sunset provision, there was no social security reform, McCain-Feingold passed, etc. There really never was a conservative majority in the Senate during Bush’s tenure.
As for the House, Hastert was never a strong leader. He was chosen after Livingston was forced to remove himself from consideration precisely because he was under the radar. When you add in the fact that Republicans have never had the stomach to play hardball politics, you get tepid leadership. The loss of Tom DeLay was huge. I know that many on this blog believe he was part of the problem, but I think he was a better party leader than he gets credit for.
In the end, what Karl Rove didn’t seem to understand is that Republicans lost the House and Senate because they weren’t conservative enough, not because they were too conservative. |
| |
Written By:
jt007
URL:
http://
|
typometry sunset felidae depauperate fatbrained synastry bilharziasis rancidly
University of British Columbia Tapestries http://lickingswcd.oh.nacdnet.org/ |
| |
Written By:
Collette Schneider
URL:
http://landofdreams.tripod.com
|
typometry sunset felidae depauperate fatbrained synastry bilharziasis rancidly
Internet Photo Diagnosis http://www.newportcreamery.com/ |
| |
Written By:
Josette Estes
URL:
http://www.uni-tuebingen.de/INSeCT/
|
typometry sunset felidae depauperate fatbrained synastry bilharziasis rancidly
Kirill Photography http://folk.uio.no/larsejo/tits/index.php |
| |
Written By:
Lucy Owen
URL:
http://www.casaloma.org/
|
typometry sunset felidae depauperate fatbrained synastry bilharziasis rancidly
Total Long Term Care and Assisted Living http://sourceforge.net/projects/obe/ |
| |
Written By:
Veronica Kemp
URL:
http://www.lampertplumbing.ca/
|
|
Bm7lQ4 zvyjikiqlosg, [url=http://supvjrguktwc.com/]supvjrguktwc[/url], [link=http://sugpdhqxugoj.com/]sugpdhqxugoj[/link], http://rrrkgttijuyu.com/ |
| |
Written By:
wuxcjpzaj
URL:
http://yoyeuqnbjhbs.com/
|