Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

AP gets to annoy its readers
Posted by: McQ on Sunday, June 15, 2008

Dina Cappiello, writing for AP, has an article out entitled "Companies Get OK to Annoy Polar Bears."

Anyone, what "companies" do you supposed Cappiello is writing about?

Good guess - yes, oil companies. The lede:
Less than a month after declaring polar bears a threatened species because of global warming, the Bush administration is giving oil companies permission to annoy and potentially harm them in the pursuit of oil and natural gas.

The Fish and Wildlife Service issued regulations this week providing legal protection to seven oil companies planning to search for oil and gas in the Chukchi Sea off the northwestern coast of Alaska if "small numbers" of polar bears or Pacific walruses are incidentally harmed by their activities over the next five years.

Environmentalists said the new regulations give oil companies a blank check to harass the polar bear.
So if you never read any further you'd gather A) Bush is responsible for giving legal cover to oil companies to harm polar bears, B) this is new ("issued regulations this week") and C) environmentalists are up in arms over yet another environmentally destructive Bush policy.

Fair summary?

So, how many polar bears might these "new regulations" effect?
About 2,000 of the 25,000 polar bears in the Arctic live in and around the Chukchi Sea, where the government in February auctioned off oil leases to ConocoPhillips Co., Shell Oil Co. and five other companies for $2.6 billion. Over objections from environmentalists and members of Congress, the sale occurred before the bear was classified as threatened in May.
Less than 10%.

And the size of the area to be explored?
Exploring in the Chukchi Sea's 29.7 million acres will require as many as five drill ships, one or two icebreakers, a barge, a tug and two helicopter flights per day, according to the government. Oil companies will also be making hundred of miles of ice roads and trails along the coastline.
So we have 2,000 bears in an area of 29.7 million acres? A bear every 148,500 acres? Pretty dense bear population, wouldn't you say? And a drill ship for every 5,940,000 acres. Certainly no room for oil exploration.

Oh, and about those regulations. How new are they?
"The oil and gas industry is operating under the kind of rules they have operated under for 15 years has not been a threat to the species," H. Dale Hall, the Fish and Wildlife Service's director, told The Associated Press on Friday. "It was the ice melting and the habitat going away that was a threat to the species over everything else."
Ummm ... not so new then, and, in fact, not even formulated under the Bush administration.

And last, but certainly not least, how many polar bears have the oil companies actually harmed under these regulations?
Administration and industry officials said oil companies enjoyed similar status in the Chukchi Sea from 1991 to 1996 and in the Beaufort Sea since 1993 and there was no effect on polar bear populations.

There is no evidence of a polar bear being killed by oil and gas activities in Alaska since 1993, according to the Fish and Wildlife Service. Since 1960, when the hunt for oil and gas began in Alaska, only two fatalities of polar bears have been linked to oil and gas activities in the state, the service said.
Of course you had to read to the final two paragraphs to find that out.

Thank you AP.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

I’m waiting for the photoshopped Abu Ghraib images with polar bears filling in for the prisoners.
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Can polar bears make a "human triangle" .. or is that a "bear triangle" ?
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Following this article, was probably yet another article bemoaning the high price of gas, and how it was hurting ordinary people.

And nobody would see any irony in it, I’m sure.
Written By: shark
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks