I think the public in a way want a do-nothing President. Bush took initiative on a few fronts, and the Left and the Media gave us 6 years of a hissy fit.
Both candidates want things that much or most of the public abhors. For example, many don’t want their lifestyles compromised by AGW mythology. They don’t want amnesty.
In light of that, a candidate that look least likely to accomplish his goals may seem more appealing.
The problem then becomes a question of whether Obama is really a do-nothing or has he just been holding back because his real policies would end his political carreer. The Presidency is effectively the end, so he no longer needs to hold back if he has. |
| |
Written By:
jpm100
URL:
http://
|
I think I figured out a way to scare off Obama’s swelling ranks of young supporters:
We must get the word out, and make sure that they all understand, that registering to vote puts your name in the hat for jury duty. I think that would just about do it. |
| |
Written By:
Ronnie Gipper
URL:
http://
|