It’s 1929 all over again, with Bush playing the hapless "Great Engineer" Hoover, as Bush has either been ineffectual (Social Security reform) or dangerous (Medicare Drug Act of 2003). Come to think of it, the Dems are pushing trade wars (no vote on Columbia per Ms. Pelosi) and ruinous taxation (if any of what Obama proposes comes to pass, from letting Bush’s tax cuts expire to raising corporate taxes to idiotic "windfall" taxes on oil companies to raising Social Security taxes on the "rich") plus, of course, no end of new government spending schemes...
We are plainly screwed. Obama will end up finishing us off with FDR-like programs that ended up prolonging and worsening the Great Depression.
Do we have any Senators or Reps that have half a brain? |
| |
Written By:
Maurice Sonnenwirth
URL:
http://
|
Yes, at most.
|
| |
Written By:
Jeff Medcalf
URL:
http://www.caerdroia.org/blog
|
"Do we have any Senators or Reps that have half a brain?"
Reporter: Governor, these people are dummies!
Governor: [whispering] I knew that, how do you think I got elected? |
| |
Written By:
CR
URL:
http://
|
Couple that plan with the Obama plan to impose "windfall taxes" on the oil companies (for which the consumer will pay at the pump), biofuel mandates (for which the consumer will pay higher food prices) and and a carbon tax (for which the consumer will pay as well) and you have all the makings of an economic disaster. But hey, so what if we’re in an economic disaster, Republicans can only get a bounce from Obama and the Democrats failing.
Yeah, and we aren’t still living with the policies enacted after the last major economic disaster (aka the Great Depression.) |
| |
Written By:
Keith_Indy
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
"so what if we’re in an economic disaster"
I see where you’re trying to go with this and I am not at all sure I disagree. Still something about that statement gnaws at me in an "Other than that, Mrs. Kennedy, how was Dallas?" kind of way. |
| |
Written By:
CR
URL:
http://
|
If unemployment increases to 7.5% (or higher) due to President Obama’s economic policies, he and his fellow Democrats will blame it on the Republicans.
And always remember this: the justification for assigning blame to any particular party need not be logical in order to be successful; it need only be succinct and "catchy", and therefore worthy of repeating over and over. Therefore, blaming Republicans is very likely to be successful. Remember also that the MSM has a vested interest in their champion, and will repeat whatever memes come out of the DNC.
This is why conservatives who boycott the election will gain nothing. They will not only get bad policy from Obama as chief executive, but they will get blamed for the failures of said policy to boot.
In my view, a better strategy for conservatives is to vote for the Republican nominee. The likelihood is higher that at least part of your agenda will be passed.
—-John Johnson |
| |
Written By:
John Johnson
URL:
http://
|
If Obama wins, I expect to see a whole lotta capital realization.
What that means is that there will be a spike in capital gains tax, at the old 15% rate, so that they don’t have to pay the expected new 25% rate.
The process of capital realization will require that the stock or asset be sold (and quite possibly re-bought), so expect a wild stock market till the end of the year, if Obama wins.
In the short term there will be this spike in tax revenues, but after that a void big enough to put the moon into. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
I see where you’re trying to go with this and I am not at all sure I disagree. Still something about that statement gnaws at me in an "Other than that, Mrs. Kennedy, how was Dallas?" kind of way. And yet, there are still people who want to see things go that way. I’m not one of them. |
| |
Written By:
Keith_Indy
URL:
http://asecondhandconjecture.com
|
|
I really hate to be picky but "effect" and "affect" are not interchangeable. |
| |
Written By:
Paul
URL:
http://
|