It’s the mentality of the "free tibet" crowd.
They don’t understand that short of a war (which they would never, ever support ever never under any circumstances) it won’t happen. Wanting it to happen isn’t nearly enough. |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
If you wanted to make a point, then the proper time would have been before China was awarded the games. They haven’t changed since in the last couple years, they’re just acting the way commie dictators always act.
snark, to quote that eminent philosopher, Mr. Freeze, egg-friggin-zactly. |
| |
Written By:
Veeshir
URL:
http://
|
|
From various reports of China, there are plenty of emissions, that have virtually nothing to do with believe or disbelieve of AGW, that need to be reduced. |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
So....if they won’t kowtow to the GW emissions standards reductions, and that’s what it means to boycott...I’m suddenly in FAVOR of boycott.
The more felled timber and rubble in the road between us and global warming hysteria treaties, the better. |
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
Your argument also assumes that anything useful would come out of a hypothetical emissions treaty that included China. I am skeptical that they would subscribe to any such agreement, and even more skeptical that they would actually perform their obligations under such an agreement. Heck, it’s in their own self interest to reduce pollution and emissions, even you confine the matter to the effects of pollution on China itself, and leave out global warming altogether. But they don’t for reasons that range through short term self interest through long range complications of corruption and internal politics. Given that, boycotting the Olympics would simply provide them with a convenient excuse to avoid facing the emissions problem. |
| |
Written By:
kishnevi
URL:
http://kishnevi.wordpress.com/
|
My thinking is if they don’t sign it, we make them the goat. Otherwise if they sign, and we fail to live up to any part of our end, regardless of what they do...we’re screwed because the hand-wringers will point at us and blame US for their failure to comply |
| |
Written By:
looker
URL:
http://
|
Your argument also assumes that anything useful would come out of a hypothetical emissions treaty that included China. My argument assumes no such thing. My argument, in full, is that you can’t act in a vacuum when engaging in diplomacy. If you want something from a country at a future negotiation, the way to ensure not even having a chance at getting it is to do something like not attending the opening ceremonies for the Olympic games in their country. |
| |
Written By:
McQ
URL:
http://www.QandO.net
|
Come on now, shark, we all know that Afghanistan was freed because Jimmy Carter boycotted the 1980 Summer Olympics. |
| |
Written By:
Steverino
URL:
http://
|