Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock


Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict


Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links


Regional News


News Publications

The Senate
Posted by: McQ on Monday, July 07, 2008

The House is lost to Republicans and the numbers there are predicted to be worse after the November election.

The Senate has been the Republican's only bastion of power in this Congress, albeit as a minority party. But in the Senate, being the minority is a very powerful position to hold, if the majority held by the other party is a slim one. That, of course, is the case now, with Democrats holding a 51-49 majority in a body that requires 60 votes to get just about anything done.

But how are the races shaping up for November?

As it turns out, Republicans are defending almost twice as many seats as Democrats (23R/12D) and it isn't looking particularly good for the Republicans.

In June of last year, the Cook Report, well respected in political circles, considered only one Republican seat to be in jeopardy. Now it is of the opinion that 7 Republican seats are in play.

Of course, last June, Trent Lott (R-MS) hadn't retired. Nor had Senator's John Warner (R-VA), Pete V. Domenici (R-NM) or Wayne Allard (R-CO) announced their intention to retire.

That has put all 4 of those seats in contention (as it is always easier to win as an incumbent than when vying for an open seat).

As for the Dems, only one seat is being seriously contested and that's the Louisiana Senate seat of Mary Landrieu.

Other contested races are in AK, MN and OR. ME has Collins who is outpolling her Democratic rival, not that it necessarily means much to the Republican balance of power in the Senate.

The point to be made, of course, was echoed in a letter Obama wrote to Democrats urging them to give to the Senate campaign effort:
"Big changes don't happen without big Senate majorities."
The possibility of such a majority is beginning to loom.
Return to Main Blog Page

Previous Comments to this Post 

That’s fine....then who’s to blame for the resulting mess will be quite clear
Written By: shark
URL: http://
". . .then who’s to blame for the resulting mess will be quite clear."

Yup. George Bush.
Written By: Christopher
URL: http://

Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Vicious Capitalism


Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks