Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Iran: Death for "on-line crimes"
Posted by: McQ on Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Meanwhile, in that benevolent theocracy (*cough* dictatorship *cough*) known as Iran, bloggers and other on-line denizens now take their lives in their hands should they run afoul of the regime's new rules:
A new law has been passed by the Iranian parliament extending use of the death penalty to online crimes. Previously, only people charged with insulting Islam or drug trafficking had been sentenced to death.

In accordance with the new law, bloggers and website editors can be sentenced to death for crimes such as promoting corruption, prostitution and apostasy, the International Freedom of Expression Exchange (IFEX) reported.
And what is it that has gotten bloggers in trouble previously?
Blogging about subjects such as minority rights and freedom of speech and religion has already carried a risk. In 2005, blogger Mojtaba Saminejad was tried before a local court in Teheran charged with insulting the prophets, which carries the death penalty. He was eventually acquitted. Last year, two Kurdish bloggers were sentenced to death on charges of subversive activities against national security, spying and separatist propaganda.
No telling what calling Ahmadinejad a stumpy little crack-pot would bring. Of course, I can say that without fear - something apologists for Iran will always forget to mention when they defend the indefensible.

As an aside, I wonder what the Canadian Human Rights council might have to say about all of this? For that matter, I wonder what the UN Human Rights Council will say?
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
What will they say?

Jack.

and Sh1t.
 
Written By: Scott Jacobs
URL: http://
And what do we see above; Iranian government spam or the NGO’s and UN’s reply.

Seriously, so apostasy, or abandoning your faith, is punishable by death. I don’t think even the Chinese have gone that far. But the President is supposed to not go to the opening ceremonies for the Olympics but negotiate with a country, Iran, which is effectively at war with us and continues to kill our troops in Iraq; and we did fight an undeclared war with them during the 1988 Tanker War and they lost. But as in 1991 with Iraq, we didn’t finish the job and are now paying for it.
 
Written By: AMR
URL: http://
It seems the House and the Senate want to follow suit.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider