Meta-Blog

SEARCH QandO

Email:
Jon Henke
Bruce "McQ" McQuain
Dale Franks
Bryan Pick
Billy Hollis
Lance Paddock
MichaelW

BLOGROLL QandO

 
 
Recent Posts
The Ayers Resurrection Tour
Special Friends Get Special Breaks
One Hour
The Hope and Change Express - stalled in the slow lane
Michael Steele New RNC Chairman
Things that make you go "hmmmm"...
Oh yeah, that "rule of law" thing ...
Putting Dollar Signs in Front Of The AGW Hoax
Moving toward a 60 vote majority?
Do As I Say ....
 
 
QandO Newsroom

Newsroom Home Page

US News

US National News
Politics
Business
Science
Technology
Health
Entertainment
Sports
Opinion/Editorial

International News

Top World New
Iraq News
Mideast Conflict

Blogging

Blogpulse Daily Highlights
Daypop Top 40 Links

Regional

Regional News

Publications

News Publications

 
Dems and the shifting political winds
Posted by: McQ on Thursday, July 10, 2008

Politico claims that "Dems [are] Searching Their Souls on Drilling".

Poppycock.

They're searching the polls, not their souls, and they aren't happy with what they find juxtaposed with their present position on the matter. So, as is typical of the breed, they're easing toward the more popular position.
Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said Wednesday that Democratic and Republican leaders are negotiating a compromise on energy legislation. Kyl declined to say who’s doing the negotiating or what results, if any, their discussions have yielded.

But Sen. John Warner (R-Va.), a longtime proponent of increased offshore drilling, said he was seeing “a big shift, a big shift in my direction,” and it was hard to find Democrats who disagreed.
We're then treated to the most preposterous quote of the day:
“I’m not knee-jerk opposed to anything,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). “We’re willing to work. We haven’t shut our minds to anything.”
Or so claims Mr. Harry "oil and gas make us sick" Reid. Instead what it means is Democrats are finally waking up to the political landmine this issue could be come Novemeber and are sliding, or slithering if you prefer, into the politically popular side of the debate.

The way you do that and still claim to be principled is to make demands while claiming it is these demands which have kept you from taking that side initially and it is all your political opponents fault for being intransigent on them. For instance:
Although Senate Democrats are slowly easing away from opposition to offshore drilling, it’s clear that the majority party is not giving it away for nothing.

One idea floated by Reid would require that whatever oil is drilled in newly opened areas would need to be sold in the United States.

Democrats also want any compromise plan to include investments in clean and renewable energies, a crackdown on oil speculators and proof that the oil and gas companies are fully utilizing land that is already leased for exploration.

“If they were showing in good faith that they were drilling on some of the 68 million acres they have now, it might change some of our attitudes,” said Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.).
The usual raft of nonsense about the "68 million acres". Joseph Petrowski answer that in today's WSJ:
The claim that the oil companies are sitting on leases and not drilling defies all logic. With oil at $135 per barrel and drilling rigs renting at $300,000 per day, there are no idle rigs anywhere.
He makes a couple of other salient points as well:
Your claim that any oil we drill for now will not come on line for five years or longer – and will thus have no effect on prices today – is incorrect. Unlike past oil crises, where the spot price of oil (that is, today's price) rose more than forward prices, the oil price for delivery in 2012 is trading at $138 per barrel. The market is sending a clear price signal that our problem is in the future – because we do not have the will to curb demand or increase supply.

How many houses would someone invest in if there were a future guarantee that the price would not decline? It is anticipation of ever-increasing prices that fuels the mania.

The oil market, however, has more than anticipation; it has a well-defined forward price signal. This is a key component of the added $25-$40 per barrel in current oil prices. Congressional hearings and "make it go away" legislation will not stop that. Demonstrate the national will to address the supply and demand issues now and it will.

As forward prices decline, watch how quickly the spot price comes down.
Bingo.

And furthermore, in remarks addressed to Republicans, Petrowski says:
Finally, can we stop with the nonsensical talk of "energy independence," the end of petroleum, and postured, ineffectual boycotts of Exxon Mobil? We cannot, should not and will not be independent in a global economy, and petroleum is not going to disappear.

A more accurate metaphor is the global energy market as a giant bath tub where more withdrawals (Chinese and Indian) are being made every day. The only consistent new supply to that tub is coming from periodically unstable and unfriendly places (Nigeria, Russia, Iran, Venezuela).

Our national interest is to add more energy, use it more efficiently, and diversify its source and type. This will serve to lessen the power of any one choke point (geography, nation or source).

Using market mechanisms and the private sector (admit it, Democrats) alongside an engaged, effective and focused government (admit it, Republicans), true leaders can solve this crisis decisively.
Of course no one will listen to Mr. Petrowski's common sense and econ 101 points. Petrowski, you see, is the president of Gulf Oil and we all know "big oil" is simply evil on toast and it's their greed which has gotten us in this shape in the first place. [/sarcasm]
 
TrackBacks
Return to Main Blog Page
 
 

Previous Comments to this Post 

Comments
Harry Reid is a sick loser. The perfect point man for the Democrats in the Senate.
But I do wonder why he didn’t run for President, he could have broken Walter Mondale’s record.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Neo - he didn’t run for the the presidency because, if nominated, he would have broken Mondale’s record. Simply stated: Reid is the poster child for the Peter Principle.
 
Written By: SShiell
URL: http://
Does Hary Reid even realize that he is the striking image of the stereotypical "grumpy old [fill in relative of your choice]" ?

Even Bob Dole knows that Bob Dole knows that.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
"Although Senate Democrats are slowly easing away from opposition to offshore drilling, it’s clear that the majority party is not giving it away for nothing"

I am willing to bet that even though the Democrats are being forced by public opinion to agree to drilling without conditions, the Republicans will agree to these demands. Why?
a)Tradition.
b)Reflexes.
c)Stupidity.
d)All of the above.
 
Written By: timactual
URL: http://
One idea floated by Reid would require that whatever oil is drilled in newly opened areas would need to be sold in the United States.
Seems like a throwaway item to me; with nearly 70% of our current oil use imported it seems highly unlikely that such a law would be invoked in the forseeable future, if ever.
Democrats also want any compromise plan to include investments in clean and renewable energies
Of course, any new legislation has to include opportunities for more lard or it will never get out of committee.
a crackdown on oil speculators
...thus assuring that more commodities exchange trading takes place overseas on the ICE or in unregulated swaps; lost revenue to the American exchanges and a higher international accounts balance deficit. Niiiiice!

The law of unintended but not unforseeable consequences is still in force and bites hard!
 
Written By: CR
URL: http://
I wonder how the approval rating for Congress can be as high as nine percent. They created this problem, and now they are grudgingly going to make a half hearted effort to undo some of the damage they caused.

They could hardly have hurt this country more had they been on Al Quaeda’s payroll.
 
Written By: MarkD
URL: http://
Eh. Since when have Democrats ever understood such difficult concepts such as ’logic’ and ’Economics 101’?
 
Written By: KMan
URL: http://
Eh. Since when have Democrats ever understood such difficult concepts such as ’logic’ and ’Economics 101’?
 
Written By: KMan
URL: http://
Perhaps the committees will "drill down" to a solution.
 
Written By: Neo
URL: http://
Harry Reid also didn’t run for the Presidency because, as a Mormon himself, Harry would have incurred the "Mitt Romney is a Mormon" problem.
 
Written By: marybel
URL: http://
Marybel, nevermind the presidency, Reid will have an extremely hard enough time defending his own seat next time around. Wouldn’t shock me if he "retired" before then if he wasn’t polling very strongly
 
Written By: shark
URL: http://
Politico claims that "Dems [are] Searching Their Souls on Drilling".

Poppycock.

They’re searching the polls, not their souls,...

I must disagree; the polls ARE the Dems Souls.
 
Written By: terrence
URL: http://

 
Add Your Comment
  NOTICE: While we don't wish to censor your thoughts, we do blacklist certain terms of profanity or obscenity. This is not to muzzle you, but to ensure that the blog remains work-safe for our readers. If you wish to use profanity, simply insert asterisks (*) where the vowels usually go. Your meaning will still be clear, but our readers will be able to view the blog without worrying that content monitoring will get them in trouble when reading it.
Comments for this entry are closed.
Name:
Email:
URL:
HTML Tools:
Bold Italic Blockquote Hyperlink
Comment:
   
 
Vicious Capitalism

Divider

Buy Dale's Book!
Slackernomics by Dale Franks

Divider

Divider