For those who read my my more serious postings, as opposed to my "progressive" postings, I don’t think anyone will accuse me of being a partisan Democrat or anti-Administration foe; that having been said, OF COURSE THEY’RE DRAWING DOWN THE FORCES FOR POLITICAL REASONS....it’s not the ONLY reason, but rest assured it’s a portion of the reason.
Bush I waited until AFTER the Nov. Elections to announce the doubling of the forces committed to Desert Shield (prelude to the offenseive campaign). Bush I adroitly boxed Congress into voting for "war" AFTER he got the UNSC to authorize force, as someone said, "How could Congress object if Botswana thought it was a good idea?"
My point is results on the battlefied affect politcs and politicians know it...it would be stupid or naive to thnk that the Administration doesn’t think that this will help the Republicans, either by blunting the attacks on the "failed" war or by demonstrating that the Republicans were right and that "stay the course" was the correct course. |
| |
Written By:
Joe
URL:
http://
|
What we have here is the Times playing the Clinton trick of trying to run far enough in front of the mob that they don’t catch you, and close enough to them that you appear to be leading the a parade. |
| |
Written By:
Bithead
URL:
http://bitsblog.florack.us
|
"OF COURSE THEY’RE DRAWING DOWN THE FORCES FOR POLITICAL REASONS."
I am shocked. Politics influencing the conduct of a war? You evil *****. You probably think that war is an extension of politics or something, too. |
| |
Written By:
timactual
URL:
http://
|