"... the advertising industry is pulling back from green-themed marketing, having "grasped the public’s growing skepticism over ads with environmental messages."
Business are starting to realize they are just selling rope to a kangaroo court. |
| |
Written By:
Dusty
URL:
http://
|
|
Is the public skeptical of Green Themes or skeptical of Greenwashing? |
| |
Written By:
Retief
URL:
http://
|
I remember reading somewhere that someone had the bright idea to start a "green" TV network.
That’s how you know "green" has jumped the shark. I mean comon, if the people behind that venture were sooooooooooooooo concerned with the environment, they’d have noticed that it would be greener to not have another boutique, useless network in the 1st place.
People don’t respond well to false messages when it comes to buying/selling |
| |
Written By:
shark
URL:
http://
|
|
Don’t worry, Peak Oil is being readied as the next faux crisis that will require (surprise, surprise) the exact same remedies as global warming. |
| |
Written By:
Robert
URL:
http://www.neolibertarian.com/blog2/
|
|
I have been reading "Reader’s Digest" for about 60 years. I have subscribed to it at times, and bought it at the check-out line when I didn’t. A couple of months ago they published a "Green" issue. Goodbye, old friend. |
| |
Written By:
Roy Lofquist
URL:
http://
|
I’d finally like to see the supply issue decoupled from the emotion of the environmental issue, so was can make some progress there.
Because, if that oil production line in the story below is not artificial and we have hit Peak Oil, we are facing an unlimited growth in oil demand until the world economy stalls out as a counter balance. Then its downhill from there as world population increases regardless of the economy. |
| |
Written By:
jpm100
URL:
http://
|
I have been reading "Reader’s Digest" for about 60 years. I have subscribed to it at times, and bought it at the check-out line when I didn’t. A couple of months ago they published a "Green" issue. Goodbye, old friend. I feel your pain. I am not renewing my subscription to Scientific American. |
| |
Written By:
Is
URL:
http://
|
There has been a much bigger deal made of global warming than of global cooling or other scares.
If, as I suspect, global warming turns out to be another scare, then the greenies will be badly discredited. |
| |
Written By:
Freddie
URL:
http://
|
then the greenies will be badly discredited. ... and they’ll find some other cause to beat me about the head and shoulders with. |
| |
Written By:
meagain
URL:
http://
|
Given that, minus the "alternative fuels", The Obama "Energy Plan" has no energy just conservation, it’s not really hard to see where he is headed.
After all Obama is the primary sponsor of the "Global Poverty Act (110th Congress, 2d Session, S. 2433)," which if passed would mandate the U.S. to spend 0.7 percent of the gross national product on foreign aid, costing the U.S. at least $845 billion dollars over thirteen years.In reality, the bill also "Commits nations to banning "small arms and light weapons" and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child," writes Cliff Kincaid.
"Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the U.N.’s "Millennium Project," says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.’s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the "Millennium Development Goals," this amounts to $845 billion. And the only way to raise that kind of money, Sachs has written, is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels." |
| |
Written By:
Neo
URL:
http://
|
|
I don’t think we can consider this an Obama Unique issue. McCain pays services to AGW now. So six of one, half dozen of the other. |
| |
Written By:
jpm100
URL:
http://
|
Because, if that oil production line in the story below is not artificial and we have hit Peak Oil, we are facing an unlimited growth in oil demand until the world economy stalls out as a counter balance. Then its downhill from there as world population increases regardless of the economy. For accuracy’s sake you should rewrite that last line to read "Then it’s downhill from there as world population decreases to a level sustainable by the new level of the economy." |
| |
Written By:
Terry
URL:
http://
|